2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          This study aimed to assess the effect of head position on the accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region on CBCT and conventional posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms. The second objective of this study was to find skull positions with the greatest and smallest effect on transverse measurements in the maxillofacial region.

          Methods:

          PA cephalograms and CBCT scans were obtained from 10 dry human skulls in 7 positions, namely the central position, 10° and 20° rotations, 10° and 20° tilts and 10° and 20° tips. The CBCT scans were converted to PA cephalograms on which distances from six landmarks, namely the nasal cavity, zygomatic arch, jugale, antegonion, condylion and zygomaticofrontal suture to the mid-sagittal plane, were measured on both sides using Dolphin two-dimensional software. The paired t-test was used to compare the mean values separately in each position (for each landmark) with the gold standard (central skull position). The interclass correlation coefficient and the Bland–Altman plot were used to compare the mean values measured by two observers.

          Results:

          The mean values of the distances measured on CBCT PA cephalograms were greater than those measured on conventional PA cephalograms; this difference was statistically significant for some landmarks ( p < 0.005). The rotated position (as compared with the central position) caused the greatest change in values for most landmarks on both sides ( p < 0.005).

          Conclusions:

          The CBCT PA cephalogram was more accurate than the conventional PA cephalogram, and landmarks farther from the midline exhibited greater changes on cephalograms compared with those closer to the midline. Patients are at risk of improper positioning when undergoing extraoral radiography such as PA cephalograms. Changes in head position may affect the transverse measurements and thus the treatment plan.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Dentomaxillofac Radiol
          Dentomaxillofac Radiol
          dmfr
          Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
          The British Institute of Radiology.
          0250-832X
          1476-542X
          July 2017
          27 July 2017
          : 46
          : 5
          : 20160180
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Islamic Republic of Iran
          [ 2 ] Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Islamic Republic of Iran
          [ 3 ] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran
          [ 4 ] Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
          [ 5 ] Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Islamic Republic of Iran
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Prof. Sepideh Falah-kooshki. E-mail: Dr.sfalah@ 123456yahoo.com
          Article
          PMC5595030 PMC5595030 5595030 D16180
          10.1259/dmfr.20160180
          5595030
          28306330
          84a6e057-9a6c-41e0-8e38-642fae40aa72
          © 2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
          History
          : Received on April 30, 2016
          : Revised on February 7, 2017
          : Accepted on March 13, 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 11, Tables: 5, References: 28, Pages: 12
          Categories
          Research Article

          cephalometry,CBCT
          cephalometry, CBCT

          Comments

          Comment on this article