9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Cefazolin in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Critically Ill Patients

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract:

          Background

          The relative distribution of cefazolin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) remains debated. Determining the distribution of cefazolin to the CSF in non-infected adults may allow for further treatment applications of cefazolin. This prospective pharmacokinetic study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefazolin in serum and CSF from external ventricular drains (EVD) in neurologically injured adults.

          Methods

          Blood and CSF was collected, using a biologic waste protocol, for cefazolin quantification and trapezoidal rule based pharmacokinetic analysis in a total of 15 critically ill adults receiving 2000mg IV every 8 hours or the renal dose equivalent for EVD prophylaxis.

          Results

          A median of 3 blood (range 2-4) and 3 CSF (range 2-5) samples were collected in each patient. The most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (66.7%). Median calculated cefazolin CSF Cmax and Cmin (IQR) were 2.97mg/L (1.76-8.56) and 1.59mg/L (0.77-2.17), respectively. Median (IQR) CSF to serum area under-the-curve ratio was 6.7% (3.7%-10.6%), with time matched estimates providing a similar estimate (8.4%). Of those receiving cefazolin every 8 hours, the median and minimum directly measured CSF cefazolin concentration 4 hours or greater following administration were 1.87 and 0.78 mg/L, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Cefazolin dosed for EVD prophylaxis achieved CSF concentrations suggesting viability as a therapeutic option for patients with meningitis or ventriculitis due to susceptible bacteria such as methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Further clinical trials are required to confirm a role in therapy for cefazolin. Population-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling may suggest an optimal cefazolin regimen for the treatment of central nervous system infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis*

          The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Standards and Practice Guidelines Committee collaborated with partner organizations to convene a panel of 10 experts on healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis. The panel represented pediatric and adult specialists in the field of infectious diseases and represented other organizations whose members care for patients with healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis (American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, and Neurocritical Care Society). The panel reviewed articles based on literature reviews, review articles and book chapters, evaluated the evidence and drafted recommendations. Questions were reviewed and approved by panel members. Subcategories were included for some questions based on specific populations of patients who may develop healthcare-associated ventriculitis and meningitis after the following procedures or situations: cerebrospinal fluid shunts, cerebrospinal fluid drains, implantation of intrathecal infusion pumps, implantation of deep brain stimulation hardware, and general neurosurgery and head trauma. Recommendations were followed by the strength of the recommendation and the quality of the evidence supporting the recommendation. Many recommendations, however, were based on expert opinion because rigorous clinical data are not available. These guidelines represent a practical and useful approach to assist practicing clinicians in the management of these challenging infections.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Penetration of drugs through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid/blood-brain barrier for treatment of central nervous system infections.

              The entry of anti-infectives into the central nervous system (CNS) depends on the compartment studied, molecular size, electric charge, lipophilicity, plasma protein binding, affinity to active transport systems at the blood-brain/blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier, and host factors such as meningeal inflammation and CSF flow. Since concentrations in microdialysates and abscesses are not frequently available for humans, this review focuses on drug CSF concentrations. The ideal compound to treat CNS infections is of small molecular size, is moderately lipophilic, has a low level of plasma protein binding, has a volume of distribution of around 1 liter/kg, and is not a strong ligand of an efflux pump at the blood-brain or blood-CSF barrier. When several equally active compounds are available, a drug which comes close to these physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties should be preferred. Several anti-infectives (e.g., isoniazid, pyrazinamide, linezolid, metronidazole, fluconazole, and some fluoroquinolones) reach a CSF-to-serum ratio of the areas under the curves close to 1.0 and, therefore, are extremely valuable for the treatment of CNS infections. In many cases, however, pharmacokinetics have to be balanced against in vitro activity. Direct injection of drugs, which do not readily penetrate into the CNS, into the ventricular or lumbar CSF is indicated when other effective therapeutic options are unavailable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Open Forum Infectious Diseases
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                2328-8957
                December 25 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacy, UCHealth - University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
                [3 ]University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
                Article
                10.1093/ofid/ofab649
                3eba8f74-9811-4555-987c-2082576e5bfb
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content397

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors294