14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) earthquake (M w 7.7): implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Southern Türkiye faced widespread catastrophic destruction by two devastating earthquakes on the same day. As the earthquakes occurred at 04:17 (M w = 7.7, Pazarcık, Kahramanmaraş) and 12:30 (M w = 7.6, Elbistan, Kahramanmaraş) on 6 February 2023, neighbouring active fault systems were broken in succession between the Hatay and Malatya provinces in the region. The first earthquake, one of the largest earthquakes in this region during the last century, caused major fatalities and widespread damage to infrastructure and buildings, and produced large-scale seismo-gravitational surface deformation such as landslides, lateral spreading, liquefaction and extensional cracks. Here, we present the surface rupture geometry and coseismic displacement characteristics of the fault systems, determined by field observations immediately after the 6 February 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) earthquake (M w = 7.7). Preliminary results show that the total rupture length ( L max ) is 270 ± 10 km on the Karasu, Pazarcık and Erkenek segments of the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Left-lateral strike-slip faulting developed with a maximum horizontal displacement ( D max ) of 7.30 m and an average displacement ( D avg ) of 3.00 m. Although the surface rupture generally exhibits a narrow deformation zone width of 2–5 m, this expands to 50 m in some sections of the faults. The implications for rupture dynamics suggest that fracture development started on a secondary fault (Narlı Fault), transferred to the main fault and triggered the breaking of asperities on the Pazarcık segment, which exhibits a long period of accumulation of stress, to initiate the major rupturing.

          Supplementary material: Figures S1–S12 with details on coseismic displacement are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6487245

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault

          Keiiti Aki (1979)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Role of Fault Bends in the Initiation and Termination of Earthquake Rupture

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of the Geological Society
                JGS
                Geological Society of London
                0016-7649
                2041-479X
                March 07 2023
                May 05 2023
                April 27 2023
                May 05 2023
                : 180
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Geological Engineering, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, 26040 Eskisehir, Türkiye
                [2 ]Earthquake Implementation and Research Center, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye
                [3 ]Department of Geological Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye
                [4 ]Department of Geological Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Dokuz Eylül University, 35390 İzmir, Türkiye
                [5 ]Earthquake Research and Implementation Center, Dokuz Eylül University, 35390 İzmir, Türkiye
                [6 ]Disaster and Emergency Management Authority of Türkiye, 06800 Ankara, Türkiye
                [7 ]Department of Geophysical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ankara University, 06830 Ankara, Türkiye
                [8 ]Department of Geological Engineering, Fırat University, 23119 Elazığ, Türkiye
                [9 ]Department of Geological Engineering, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140 Sivas, Türkiye
                Article
                10.1144/jgs2023-020
                41e58fea-32ba-4b7b-96da-b6bab99da58a
                © 2023

                https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/publications/lyell-collection/user-license-1-1

                https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/publications/lyell-collection/user-license-1-2

                https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/publications/lyell-collection/user-license-1-1

                https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/publications/lyell-collection/user-license-1-2

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article