6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Riverine and Coastal Flood Modeling

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the past decades, the scientific community has made significant efforts to simulate flooding conditions using a variety of complex physically based models. Despite all advances, these models still fall short in accuracy and reliability and are often considered computationally intensive to be fully operational. This could be attributed to insufficient comprehension of the causative mechanisms of flood processes, assumptions in model development and inadequate consideration of uncertainties. We suggest adopting an approach that accounts for the influence of human activities, soil saturation, snow processes, topography, river morphology, and land‐use type to enhance our understanding of flood generating mechanisms. We also recommend a transition to the development of innovative earth system modeling frameworks where the interaction among all components of the earth system are simultaneously modeled. Additionally, more nonselective and rigorous studies should be conducted to provide a detailed comparison of physical models and simplified methods for flood inundation mapping. Linking process‐based models with data‐driven/statistical methods offers a variety of opportunities that are yet to be explored and conveyed to researchers and emergency managers. The main contribution of this paper is to notify scientists and practitioners of the latest developments in flood characterization and modeling, identify challenges in understanding flood processes, associated uncertainties and risks in coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling for forecasting and inundation mapping, and the potential use of state‐of‐the‐art data assimilation and machine learning to tackle the complexities involved in transitioning such developments to operation.

          Plain Language Summary

          Every year, a large number of people are affected by flooding and suffer its costly consequences across the world. To properly manage this notorious natural disaster, the physical processes that represent riverine and coastal floods should be well understood and modeled. Over the recent decades, the scientific community has been continuously involved in characterizing the main components of floods and improving flood modeling skills using both types of physical and statistical models. Despite all these efforts, our modeling skill has major limitations which hinder an optimum performance for accurate and efficient flood forecasting. In this article, we provide a thorough review of these past efforts, highlight the main challenges, and provide potential pathways for improved flood characterization and modeling in the future. We specifically discuss the causative mechanisms of floods, physical/statistical methods used to characterize different components of flooding, coupling approaches, methods used to account for uncertainty in different layers of flood modeling, and their benefits for operational flood forecasting systems.

          Key Points

          • Causative mechanisms of floods and underlying physical processes in both riverine and coastal floods are thoroughly discussed and reviewed

          • The weak and selective validation of flood inundation models and the lack of sufficient validation data is a major challenge

          • Hybrid methods linking statistical and numerical tools are recommended for efficient and more accurate coastal flood hazard analysis

          Related collections

          Most cited references620

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Deep learning in neural networks: An overview

          In recent years, deep artificial neural networks (including recurrent ones) have won numerous contests in pattern recognition and machine learning. This historical survey compactly summarizes relevant work, much of it from the previous millennium. Shallow and Deep Learners are distinguished by the depth of their credit assignment paths, which are chains of possibly learnable, causal links between actions and effects. I review deep supervised learning (also recapitulating the history of backpropagation), unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning & evolutionary computation, and indirect search for short programs encoding deep and large networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult.

              Recurrent neural networks can be used to map input sequences to output sequences, such as for recognition, production or prediction problems. However, practical difficulties have been reported in training recurrent neural networks to perform tasks in which the temporal contingencies present in the input/output sequences span long intervals. We show why gradient based learning algorithms face an increasingly difficult problem as the duration of the dependencies to be captured increases. These results expose a trade-off between efficient learning by gradient descent and latching on information for long periods. Based on an understanding of this problem, alternatives to standard gradient descent are considered.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Reviews of Geophysics
                Reviews of Geophysics
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                8755-1209
                1944-9208
                June 2023
                June 07 2023
                June 2023
                : 61
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA
                [2 ] Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA
                [3 ] European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UK
                [4 ] School of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK
                [5 ] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Princeton University Princeton NJ USA
                [6 ] Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken NJ USA
                [7 ] Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering George Mason University Fairfax VA USA
                [8 ] Department of Geography and Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK
                [9 ] NOAA‐NWS Office of Water Prediction Tuscaloosa AL USA
                [10 ] College of Hydrology and Water Resources Hohai University Nanjing China
                Article
                10.1029/2022RG000788
                40b6daef-57f3-4b17-afe7-169f7a820e30
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article