Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) previously published
treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder in 2005, along with international commentaries
and subsequent updates in 2007, 2009, and 2013. The last two updates were published
in collaboration with the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD). These
2018 CANMAT and ISBD Bipolar Treatment Guidelines represent the significant advances
in the field since the last full edition was published in 2005, including updates
to diagnosis and management as well as new research into pharmacological and psychological
treatments. These advances have been translated into clear and easy to use recommendations
for first, second, and third‐ line treatments, with consideration given to levels
of evidence for efficacy, clinical support based on experience, and consensus ratings
of safety, tolerability, and treatment‐emergent switch risk. New to these guidelines,
hierarchical rankings were created for first and second‐ line treatments recommended
for acute mania, acute depression, and maintenance treatment in bipolar I disorder.
Created by considering the impact of each treatment across all phases of illness,
this hierarchy will further assist clinicians in making evidence‐based treatment decisions.
Lithium, quetiapine, divalproex, asenapine, aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone,
and cariprazine alone or in combination are recommended as first‐line treatments for
acute mania. First‐line options for bipolar I depression include quetiapine, lurasidone
plus lithium or divalproex, lithium, lamotrigine, lurasidone, or adjunctive lamotrigine.
While medications that have been shown to be effective for the acute phase should
generally be continued for the maintenance phase in bipolar I disorder, there are
some exceptions (such as with antidepressants); and available data suggest that lithium,
quetiapine, divalproex, lamotrigine, asenapine, and aripiprazole monotherapy or combination
treatments should be considered first‐line for those initiating or switching treatment
during the maintenance phase. In addition to addressing issues in bipolar I disorder,
these guidelines also provide an overview of, and recommendations for, clinical management
of bipolar II disorder, as well as advice on specific populations, such as women at
various stages of the reproductive cycle, children and adolescents, and older adults.
There are also discussions on the impact of specific psychiatric and medical comorbidities
such as substance use, anxiety, and metabolic disorders. Finally, an overview of issues
related to safety and monitoring is provided. The CANMAT and ISBD groups hope that
these guidelines become a valuable tool for practitioners across the globe.
The principles of shared decision making are well documented but there is a lack of guidance about how to accomplish the approach in routine clinical practice. Our aim here is to translate existing conceptual descriptions into a three-step model that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development. Achieving shared decision making depends on building a good relationship in the clinical encounter so that information is shared and patients are supported to deliberate and express their preferences and views during the decision making process. To accomplish these tasks, we propose a model of how to do shared decision making that is based on choice, option and decision talk. The model has three steps: a) introducing choice, b) describing options, often by integrating the use of patient decision support, and c) helping patients explore preferences and make decisions. This model rests on supporting a process of deliberation, and on understanding that decisions should be influenced by exploring and respecting “what matters most” to patients as individuals, and that this exploration in turn depends on them developing informed preferences.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.