87
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion.

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 5 , 8 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 4 , 19 , 20 , 8 , 21 , 2 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29
      Nature protocols
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Developing a mechanistic understanding of the impact of food structure and composition on human health has increasingly involved simulating digestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract. These simulations have used a wide range of different conditions that often have very little physiological relevance, and this impedes the meaningful comparison of results. The standardized protocol presented here is based on an international consensus developed by the COST INFOGEST network. The method is designed to be used with standard laboratory equipment and requires limited experience to encourage a wide range of researchers to adopt it. It is a static digestion method that uses constant ratios of meal to digestive fluids and a constant pH for each step of digestion. This makes the method simple to use but not suitable for simulating digestion kinetics. Using this method, food samples are subjected to sequential oral, gastric and intestinal digestion while parameters such as electrolytes, enzymes, bile, dilution, pH and time of digestion are based on available physiological data. This amended and improved digestion method (INFOGEST 2.0) avoids challenges associated with the original method, such as the inclusion of the oral phase and the use of gastric lipase. The method can be used to assess the endpoints resulting from digestion of foods by analyzing the digestion products (e.g., peptides/amino acids, fatty acids, simple sugars) and evaluating the release of micronutrients from the food matrix. The whole protocol can be completed in ~7 d, including ~5 d required for the determination of enzyme activities.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Nat Protoc
          Nature protocols
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1750-2799
          1750-2799
          April 2019
          : 14
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Ireland. andre.brodkorb@teagasc.ie.
          [2 ] Agroscope, Bern, Switzerland.
          [3 ] Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
          [4 ] National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon and CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
          [5 ] Nofima AS, Ås, Norway.
          [6 ] Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
          [7 ] INRA/Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
          [8 ] STLO, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, Rennes, France.
          [9 ] Aix-Marseille, CNRS, UMR7281 Bioénergétique et Ingénierie des Protéines, Marseille, France.
          [10 ] Estación Experimental del Zaidin, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Granada, Spain.
          [11 ] Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
          [12 ] SQPOV, INRA, Avignon, France.
          [13 ] Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
          [14 ] Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
          [15 ] Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
          [16 ] Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa, Israel.
          [17 ] Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
          [18 ] School of Food Science & Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
          [19 ] BIA, INRA, Nantes, France.
          [20 ] Chenoweth Lab, Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
          [21 ] Triskelion, Zeist, the Netherlands.
          [22 ] Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Oeiras, Portugal.
          [23 ] Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.
          [24 ] GMPA, AgroParisTech, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
          [25 ] Departments of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, and of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
          [26 ] Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
          [27 ] Reacta Biotech Limited, The Langley Building, Manchester, UK.
          [28 ] Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
          [29 ] Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.
          Article
          10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1
          10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1
          30886367
          ba44c0df-e7a2-4ccf-b023-75bd5fa29ae6
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article