There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Background
Population-based data on COVID-19 are essential for guiding policies. There are few
such studies, particularly from low or middle-income countries. Brazil is currently
a hotspot for COVID-19 globally. We aimed to investigate severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody prevalence by city and according to sex,
age, ethnicity group, and socioeconomic status, and compare seroprevalence estimates
with official statistics on deaths and cases.
Methods
In this repeated cross-sectional study, we did two seroprevalence surveys in 133 sentinel
cities in all Brazilian states. We randomly selected households and randomly selected
one individual from all household members. We excluded children younger than 1 year.
Presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using a lateral flow point-of-care
test, the WONDFO SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test (Wondfo Biotech, Guangzhou, China), using
two drops of blood from finger prick samples. This lateral-flow assay detects IgG
and IgM isotypes that are specific to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain of the
spike protein. Participants also answered short questionnaires on sociodemographic
information (sex, age, education, ethnicity, household size, and household assets)
and compliance with physical distancing measures.
Findings
We included 25 025 participants in the first survey (May 14–21) and 31 165 in the
second (June 4–7). For the 83 (62%) cities with sample sizes of more than 200 participants
in both surveys, the pooled seroprevalence increased from 1·9% (95% CI 1·7–2·1) to
3·1% (2·8–3·4). City-level prevalence ranged from 0% to 25·4% in both surveys. 11
(69%) of 16 cities with prevalence above 2·0% in the first survey were located in
a stretch along a 2000 km of the Amazon river in the northern region. In the second
survey, we found 34 cities with prevalence above 2·0%, which included the same 11
Amazon cities plus 14 from the northeast region, where prevalence was increasing rapidly.
Prevalence levels were lower in the south and centre-west, and intermediate in the
southeast, where the highest level was found in Rio de Janeiro (7·5% [4·2–12·2]).
In the second survey, prevalence was similar in men and women, but an increased prevalence
was observed in participants aged 20–59 years and those living in crowded conditions
(4·4% [3·5–5·6] for those living with households with six or more people). Prevalence
among Indigenous people was 6·4% (4·1–9·4) compared with 1·4% (1·2–1·7) among White
people. Prevalence in the poorest socioeconomic quintile was 3·7% (3·2–4·3) compared
with 1·7% (1·4–2·2) in the wealthiest quintile.
Interpretation
Antibody prevalence was highly heterogeneous by country region, with rapid initial
escalation in Brazil's north and northeast. Prevalence is strongly associated with
Indigenous ancestry and low socioeconomic status. These population subgroups are unlikely
to be protected if the policy response to the pandemic by the national government
continues to downplay scientific evidence.
Funding
Brazilian Ministry of Health, Instituto Serrapilheira, Brazilian Collective Health
Association, and the JBS Fazer o Bem Faz Bem.
The clinical features and immune responses of asymptomatic individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have not been well described. We studied 37 asymptomatic individuals in the Wanzhou District who were diagnosed with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections but without any relevant clinical symptoms in the preceding 14 d and during hospitalization. Asymptomatic individuals were admitted to the government-designated Wanzhou People's Hospital for centralized isolation in accordance with policy1. The median duration of viral shedding in the asymptomatic group was 19 d (interquartile range (IQR), 15-26 d). The asymptomatic group had a significantly longer duration of viral shedding than the symptomatic group (log-rank P = 0.028). The virus-specific IgG levels in the asymptomatic group (median S/CO, 3.4; IQR, 1.6-10.7) were significantly lower (P = 0.005) relative to the symptomatic group (median S/CO, 20.5; IQR, 5.8-38.2) in the acute phase. Of asymptomatic individuals, 93.3% (28/30) and 81.1% (30/37) had reduction in IgG and neutralizing antibody levels, respectively, during the early convalescent phase, as compared to 96.8% (30/31) and 62.2% (23/37) of symptomatic patients. Forty percent of asymptomatic individuals became seronegative and 12.9% of the symptomatic group became negative for IgG in the early convalescent phase. In addition, asymptomatic individuals exhibited lower levels of 18 pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. These data suggest that asymptomatic individuals had a weaker immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The reduction in IgG and neutralizing antibody levels in the early convalescent phase might have implications for immunity strategy and serological surveys.
Abstract Background During the current worldwide pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) was first diagnosed in Iceland at the end of February. However, data are limited on how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, enters and spreads in a population. Methods We targeted testing to persons living in Iceland who were at high risk for infection (mainly those who were symptomatic, had recently traveled to high-risk countries, or had contact with infected persons). We also carried out population screening using two strategies: issuing an open invitation to 10,797 persons and sending random invitations to 2283 persons. We sequenced SARS-CoV-2 from 643 samples. Results As of April 4, a total of 1221 of 9199 persons (13.3%) who were recruited for targeted testing had positive results for infection with SARS-CoV-2. Of those tested in the general population, 87 (0.8%) in the open-invitation screening and 13 (0.6%) in the random-population screening tested positive for the virus. In total, 6% of the population was screened. Most persons in the targeted-testing group who received positive tests early in the study had recently traveled internationally, in contrast to those who tested positive later in the study. Children under 10 years of age were less likely to receive a positive result than were persons 10 years of age or older, with percentages of 6.7% and 13.7%, respectively, for targeted testing; in the population screening, no child under 10 years of age had a positive result, as compared with 0.8% of those 10 years of age or older. Fewer females than males received positive results both in targeted testing (11.0% vs. 16.7%) and in population screening (0.6% vs. 0.9%). The haplotypes of the sequenced SARS-CoV-2 viruses were diverse and changed over time. The percentage of infected participants that was determined through population screening remained stable for the 20-day duration of screening. Conclusions In a population-based study in Iceland, children under 10 years of age and females had a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection than adolescents or adults and males. The proportion of infected persons identified through population screening did not change substantially during the screening period, which was consistent with a beneficial effect of containment efforts. (Funded by deCODE Genetics–Amgen.)
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.