47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of EFSA Pesticide Residue Intake Model (EFSA PRIMo revision 3)

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract Since 2007, the EFSA PRIMo (Pesticide Residue Intake Model), an Excel‐based calculation spreadsheet, is the standard tool used at EU level to perform the dietary risk assessment for pesticide residues in the framework of setting and reviewing of maximum residue levels for pesticides under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and in the peer review of pesticides under Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009. The model was now updated with regard to food consumption data derived from some recent dietary food surveys. In addition, new functionalities were included in the calculation spread sheet to make the tool more user‐friendly and to allow automatic integration of the EFSA PRIMo in the workflows where dietary risk assessments are performed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reasoned opinion on the potential chronic and acute risk to consumers health arising from proposed temporary EU MRLs

          (2007)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The 2010 European Union Report on Pesticide Residues in Food

            (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The 2015 European Union report on pesticide residues in food

              (2017)
              This report provides a detailed insight in the official control activities performed by EU Member States, Iceland and Norway. Overall, 97.2% of the 84,341 samples analysed in 2015 were free of quantifiable residues or contained residues within the legally permitted levels. Based on the analytical results provided by the reporting countries, a detailed data analysis was performed regarding pesticide occurrence in the most important food products consumed and the dietary risk related to the exposure of European consumers to pesticide residues. Moreover, the data were analysed with view to identify pesticides and food products that exceeded the legal limits. It also contains the findings on pesticide residues in imported food, organic products, baby food as well as results for animal products. Based on the analysis of the 2015 pesticide monitoring results, EFSA derived a number of recommendations to increase the efficiency of the European control systems to ensure a high level of consumer protection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFSA Journal
                EFS2
                EFSA Journal
                Wiley
                18314732
                18314732
                January 2018
                January 2018
                : 16
                : 1
                Article
                10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5147
                6e422d14-9d2a-45b5-ab50-426cf9850171
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                349
                0
                253
                0
                Smart Citations
                349
                0
                253
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,970

                Cited by262

                Most referenced authors11