49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion in Borneo

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          New plantations can either cause deforestation by replacing natural forests or avoid this by using previously cleared areas. The extent of these two situations is contested in tropical biodiversity hotspots where objective data are limited. Here, we explore delays between deforestation and the establishment of industrial tree plantations on Borneo using satellite imagery. Between 1973 and 2015 an estimated 18.7 Mha of Borneo’s old-growth forest were cleared (14.4 Mha and 4.2 Mha in Indonesian and Malaysian Borneo). Industrial plantations expanded by 9.1 Mha (7.8 Mha oil-palm; 1.3 Mha pulpwood). Approximately 7.0 Mha of the total plantation area in 2015 (9.2 Mha) were old-growth forest in 1973, of which 4.5–4.8 Mha (24–26% of Borneo-wide deforestation) were planted within five years of forest clearance (3.7–3.9 Mha oil-palm; 0.8–0.9 Mha pulpwood). This rapid within-five-year conversion has been greater in Malaysia than in Indonesia (57–60% versus 15–16%). In Indonesia, a higher proportion of oil-palm plantations was developed on already cleared degraded lands (a legacy of recurrent forest fires). However, rapid conversion of Indonesian forests to industrial plantations has increased steeply since 2005. We conclude that plantation industries have been the principle driver of deforestation in Malaysian Borneo over the last four decades. In contrast, their role in deforestation in Indonesian Borneo was less marked, but has been growing recently. We note caveats in interpreting these results and highlight the need for greater accountability in plantation development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon.

          Amazon deforestation has been measured by remote sensing for three decades. In comparison, selective logging has been mostly invisible to satellites. We developed a large-scale, high-resolution, automated remote-sensing analysis of selective logging in the top five timber-producing states of the Brazilian Amazon. Logged areas ranged from 12,075 to 19,823 square kilometers per year (+/-14%) between 1999 and 2002, equivalent to 60 to 123% of previously reported deforestation area. Up to 1200 square kilometers per year of logging were observed on conservation lands. Each year, 27 million to 50 million cubic meters of wood were extracted, and a gross flux of approximately 0.1 billion metric tons of carbon was destined for release to the atmosphere by logging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                08 September 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 32017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for International Forestry Research , P.O. Box 0113 BOCBD, Bogor 16000, Indonesia
                [2 ]Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management (INA), Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU) , Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
                [3 ]Borneo Futures project, People and Nature Consulting International , Ciputat, Jakarta, 15412, Indonesia
                [4 ]HUTAN, Kinabatangan Orang-utan Conservation Programme, Kota Kinabalu , Sabah, Malaysia
                [5 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
                Author notes
                Article
                srep32017
                10.1038/srep32017
                5015015
                27605501
                541353f6-9e2d-4992-b481-d6e0c10afcfd
                Copyright © 2016, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 14 October 2015
                : 30 June 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article