4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implementing human factors in anaesthesia: guidance for clinicians, departments and hospitals : Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society and the Association of Anaesthetists

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

          To investigate how consensus is operationalized in Delphi studies and to explore the role of consensus in determining the results of these studies. Systematic review of a random sample of 100 English language Delphi studies, from two large multidisciplinary databases [ISI Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL)], published between 2000 and 2009. About 98 of the Delphi studies purported to assess consensus, although a definition for consensus was only provided in 72 of the studies (64 a priori). The most common definition for consensus was percent agreement (25 studies), with 75% being the median threshold to define consensus. Although the authors concluded in 86 of the studies that consensus was achieved, consensus was only specified a priori (with a threshold value) in 42 of these studies. Achievement of consensus was related to the decision to stop the Delphi study in only 23 studies, with 70 studies terminating after a specified number of rounds. Although consensus generally is felt to be of primary importance to the Delphi process, definitions of consensus vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria for reporting of methods of Delphi studies are required. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID ‐19

              Summary Severe acute respiratory syndrome‐corona virus‐2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), is highly contagious. Airway management of patients with COVID‐19 is high risk to staff and patients. We aimed to develop principles for airway management of patients with COVID‐19 to encourage safe, accurate and swift performance. This consensus statement has been brought together at short notice to advise on airway management for patients with COVID‐19, drawing on published literature and immediately available information from clinicians and experts. Recommendations on the prevention of contamination of healthcare workers, the choice of staff involved in airway management, the training required and the selection of equipment are discussed. The fundamental principles of airway management in these settings are described for: emergency tracheal intubation; predicted or unexpected difficult tracheal intubation; cardiac arrest; anaesthetic care; and tracheal extubation. We provide figures to support clinicians in safe airway management of patients with COVID‐19. The advice in this document is designed to be adapted in line with local workplace policies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Anaesthesia
                Anaesthesia
                Wiley
                0003-2409
                1365-2044
                January 11 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Bath UK
                [2 ]Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Northampton General Hospital Northampton UK
                [3 ]University of Leicester, College of Life Sciences/Leicester Medical School Leicester UK
                [4 ]Department of Anaesthetics Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [5 ]Bristol University Bristol UK
                [6 ]Department of Anaesthesia Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK
                [7 ]Aberdeen Business School Robert Gordon University Aberdeen UK
                [8 ]Department of Anaesthesia University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [9 ]Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy University College London UK
                [10 ]Department of Anaesthesia Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree, Liverpool UK
                [11 ]University College Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [12 ]Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering University of Nottingham UK
                [13 ]Department of Anaesthesia James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK
                [14 ]Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
                [15 ]Department of Anaesthesia Swansea Bay University Health Board Swansea UK
                [16 ]Centre for Implementation Science King's College London UK
                [17 ]Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK
                Article
                10.1111/anae.15941
                de027765-8663-45b7-8fdd-48c2f7fc43ac
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article