29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is a [Related article:] Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.

          Key Points

          • The phase 2 CAVALLI study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax + R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, including Bcl-2 + subpopulations.

          • Venetoclax + R-CHOP showed potential for improved efficacy vs R-CHOP alone, supporting further investigation of venetoclax in Bcl-2 + DLBCL.

          Abstract

          The phase 2 CAVALLI (NCT02055820) study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in first-line (1L) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients demonstrating Bcl-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2 IHC +). Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had previously untreated DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and International Prognostic Index 2 to 5. Venetoclax 800 mg (days 4-10, cycle 1; days 1-10, cycles 2-8) was administered with rituximab (8 cycles) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (6-8 cycles) in 21-day cycles. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and complete response (CR) at end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses used covariate-adjusted R-CHOP controls from the GOYA/BO21005 study, an appropriate contemporary benchmark for safety and efficacy. Safety and efficacy analyses included 206 patients. CR rate at EOT was 69% in the overall population and was maintained across Bcl-2 IHC + subgroups. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, trends were observed for improved investigator-assessed PFS for venetoclax plus R-CHOP in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.87) and Bcl-2 IHC + subgroups (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) vs R-CHOP. Despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (86%), related mortality was not increased (2%). Chemotherapy dose intensity was similar in CAVALLI vs GOYA. The addition of venetoclax to R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL demonstrates increased, but manageable, myelosuppression and the potential of improved efficacy, particularly in high-risk Bcl-2 IHC + patient subgroups.

          Visual Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.

          A revision of the nearly 8-year-old World Health Organization classification of the lymphoid neoplasms and the accompanying monograph is being published. It reflects a consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, and clinicians regarding both updates to current entities as well as the addition of a limited number of new provisional entities. The revision clarifies the diagnosis and management of lesions at the very early stages of lymphomagenesis, refines the diagnostic criteria for some entities, details the expanding genetic/molecular landscape of numerous lymphoid neoplasms and their clinical correlates, and refers to investigations leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies. The major changes are reviewed with an emphasis on the most important advances in our understanding that impact our diagnostic approach, clinical expectations, and therapeutic strategies for the lymphoid neoplasms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.

            The purpose of this work was to modernize recommendations for evaluation, staging, and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A workshop was held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, in June 2011, that included leading hematologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, representing major international lymphoma clinical trials groups and cancer centers. Clinical and imaging subcommittees presented their conclusions at a subsequent workshop at the 12th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, leading to revised criteria for staging and of the International Working Group Guidelines of 2007 for response. As a result, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) was formally incorporated into standard staging for FDG-avid lymphomas. A modification of the Ann Arbor descriptive terminology will be used for anatomic distribution of disease extent, but the suffixes A or B for symptoms will only be included for HL. A bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated for the routine staging of HL and most diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. However, regardless of stage, general practice is to treat patients based on limited (stages I and II, nonbulky) or advanced (stage III or IV) disease, with stage II bulky disease considered as limited or advanced disease based on histology and a number of prognostic factors. PET-CT will be used to assess response in FDG-avid histologies using the 5-point scale. The product of the perpendicular diameters of a single node can be used to identify progressive disease. Routine surveillance scans are discouraged. These recommendations should improve evaluation of patients with lymphoma and enhance the ability to compare outcomes of clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genetics and Pathogenesis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

              BACKGROUND Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous. Gene-expression profiling has identified subgroups of DLBCL (activated B-cell–like [ABC], germinal-center B-cell–like [GCB], and unclassified) according to cell of origin that are associated with a differential response to chemotherapy and targeted agents. We sought to extend these findings by identifying genetic subtypes of DLBCL based on shared genomic abnormalities and to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities based on tumor genetics. METHODS We studied 574 DLBCL biopsy samples using exome and transcriptome sequencing, array-based DNA copy-number analysis, and targeted amplicon resequencing of 372 genes to identify genes with recurrent aberrations. We developed and implemented an algorithm to discover genetic subtypes based on the co-occurrence of genetic alterations. RESULTS We identified four prominent genetic subtypes in DLBCL, termed MCD (based on the co-occurrence of MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutations), BN2 (based on BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations), N1 (based on NOTCH1 mutations), and EZB (based on EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations). Genetic aberrations in multiple genes distinguished each genetic subtype from other DLBCLs. These subtypes differed phenotypically, as judged by differences in gene-expression signatures and responses to immunochemotherapy, with favorable survival in the BN2 and EZB subtypes and inferior outcomes in the MCD and N1 subtypes. Analysis of genetic pathways suggested that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on “chronic active” B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition. CONCLUSIONS We uncovered genetic subtypes of DLBCL with distinct genotypic, epigenetic, and clinical characteristics, providing a potential nosology for precision-medicine strategies in DLBCL. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and others.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood
                Blood
                bloodjournal
                blood
                Blood
                Blood
                American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
                0006-4971
                1528-0020
                4 February 2021
                21 September 2020
                4 February 2021
                : 137
                : 5
                : 600-609
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Université de Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Lille, Groupe de Recherche sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (ULR 7365–GRITA), Lille, France;
                [2 ]CHU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre lès Nancy, France;
                [3 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute-Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN;
                [4 ]Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia;
                [5 ]Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute–Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Salzburg, Austria;
                [6 ]Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary;
                [7 ]Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada;
                [8 ]CHU de Québec, Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus, Quebec City, QC, Canada;
                [9 ]HOVON Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase I-II Consortium, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
                [10 ]Azienda Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy;
                [11 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, University of Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France;
                [12 ]First Department of Medicine, Charles University General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic;
                [13 ]David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA;
                [14 ]Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom;
                [15 ]Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA;
                [16 ]AbbVie, North Chicago, IL;
                [17 ]Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom;
                [18 ]F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; and
                [19 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-9824
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-8757
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6735-8651
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-8666
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-6073
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-6883
                Article
                PMC7869186 PMC7869186 7869186 2020/BLD2020006578
                10.1182/blood.2020006578
                7869186
                33538797
                f7ca0fc0-a126-4549-8997-45c883c1394a
                © 2021 by The American Society of Hematology
                History
                : 22 April 2020
                : 24 August 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health;
                Categories
                8
                39
                Clinical Trials and Observations
                Custom metadata
                free

                Comments

                Comment on this article