20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cervical plexus block

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cervical plexus blocks (CPBs) have been used in various head and neck surgeries to provide adequate anesthesia and/or analgesia; however, the block is performed in a narrow space in the region of the neck that contains many sensitive structures, multiple fascial layers, and complicated innervation. Since the intermediate CPB was introduced in addition to superficial and deep CPBs in 2004, there has been some confusion regarding the nomenclature and definition of CPBs, particularly the intermediate CPB. Additionally, as the role of ultrasound in the head and neck region has expanded, CPBs can be performed more safely and accurately under ultrasound guidance. In this review, the authors will describe the methods, including ultrasound-guided techniques, and clinical applications of conventional deep and superficial CPBs; in addition, the authors will discuss the controversial issues regarding intermediate CPBs, including nomenclature and associated potential adverse effects that may often be neglected, focusing on the anatomy of the cervical fascial layers and cervical plexus. Finally, the authors will attempt to refine the classification of CPB methods based on the target compartments, which can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance, with consideration of the effects of each method of CPB.

          Related collections

          Most cited references148

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Defining the fascial system

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Superficial or deep cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of complications.

            Carotid endarterectomy is commonly conducted under regional (deep, superficial, intermediate, or combined) cervical plexus block, but it is not known if complication rates differ. We conducted a systematic review of published papers to assess the complication rate associated with superficial (or intermediate) and deep (or combined deep plus superficial/intermediate). The null hypothesis was that complication rates were equal. Complications of interest were: (1) serious complications related to the placement of block, (2) incidence of conversion to general anaesthesia, and (3) serious systemic complications of the surgical-anaesthetic process. We retrieved 69 papers describing a total of 7558 deep/combined blocks and 2533 superficial/intermediate blocks. Deep/combined block was associated with a higher serious complication rate related to the injecting needle when compared with the superficial/intermediate block (odds ratio 2.13, P = 0.006). The conversion rate to general anaesthesia was also higher with deep/combined block (odds ratio 5.15, P < 0.0001), but there was an equivalent incidence of other systemic serious complications (odds ratio 1.13, P = 0.273; NS). We conclude that superficial/intermediate block is safer than any method that employs a deep injection. The higher rate of conversion to general anaesthesia with the deep/combined block may have been influenced by the higher incidence of direct complications, but may also suggest that the superficial/combined block provides better analgesia during surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical anatomy of the cervical sympathetic trunk during anterolateral approach to cervical spine.

              The sympathetic trunk is sometimes damaged during the anterior and anterolateral approach to the cervical spine, resulting in Horner's syndrome. No quantitative regional anatomy in fresh human cadavers describing the course and location of the cervical sympathetic trunk (CST) and its relation to the longus colli muscle (LCM) is available in the literature. The aims of this study are to clearly delineate the surgical anatomy and the anatomical variations of CST with respect to the structures around it and to develop a safer surgical method that will diminish the potential risk of CST injury. In this study, 30 cadavers from the Department of Forensic Medicine were dissected to observe the surgical anatomy of the CST. The cadavers used in this study were fresh cadavers chosen at 12-24 h postmortem. The levels of superior and intermediate ganglions of cervical sympathetic chain were determined. The distance of the sympathetic trunk from the medial border of LCM at C6, the diameter of the CST at C6 and the length and width of the superior and intermediate (middle) cervical ganglion were measured. Cervical sympathetic chain is located posteromedial to carotid sheath and just anterior to the longus muscles. It extends longitudinally from the longus capitis to the longus colli over the muscles and under the prevertebral fascia. The average distance between the CST and medial border of the LCM at C6 is 11.6 +/- 1.6 mm. The average diameter of the CST at C6 is 3.3 +/- 0.6 mm. Superior ganglion of CSC in all dissections was located at the level of C4 vertebra. The length and width of the superior cervical ganglion were 12.5 +/- 1.5 and 5.3 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively. The location of the intermediate (middle) ganglion of CST showed some variations. The length and width of the middle cervical ganglion were 10.5 +/- 1.3 and 6.3 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively. The CST's are at high risk when the LC muscle is cut transversely, or when dissection of the prevertebral fascia is performed. Awareness of the CST's regional anatomy may help the surgeon to identify and preserve it during anterior cervical surgeries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                KJA
                Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
                Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
                2005-6419
                2005-7563
                August 2018
                4 July 2018
                : 71
                : 4
                : 274-288
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
                [2 ]Depatment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine,, Seoul, Korea
                [3 ]Depatment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jin-Soo Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University College of Medicine, 206, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea Tel: 82-31-219-5748, Fax: 82-31-219-5579 Email: jskane@ 123456ajou.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-2475
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-0550
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-7691
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-9986
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-2155
                Article
                kja-d-18-00143
                10.4097/kja.d.18.00143
                6078883
                29969890
                586fb492-321b-4f91-93cd-9154c7d41f52
                Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2018

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 May 2018
                : 19 June 2018
                : 24 June 2018
                Categories
                Review Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                airway obstruction,cervical fascia,cervical plexus,cervical plexus block,phrenic nerve palsy,ultrasonography

                Comments

                Comment on this article