For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
5
views
14
references
 Top references
cited by
8
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      49
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Screening outcomes by risk factor and age: evidence from BreastScreen WA for discussions of risk-stratified population screening.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To estimate rates of screen-detected and interval breast cancers, stratified by risk factor, to inform discussions of risk-stratified population screening.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

          Evan Myers, Patricia Moorman, Jennifer M. Gierisch … (2015)
          Patients need to consider both benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.
          Article 0 comments Cited 187 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

            D Spiegelman (2005)
            Article 0 comments Cited 185 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer

              Nora Pashayan, Steve Morris, Fiona J. Gilbert … (2018)
              This cost-effectiveness study uses a life-table model of a hypothetical cohort of 364 500 women to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and benefit to harm ratio of risk-stratified screening for breast cancer.
              Article 0 comments Cited 97 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Med J Aust
                Title: The Medical journal of Australia
                Publisher: Wiley
                ISSN (Electronic): 1326-5377
                ISSN (Print): 0025-729X
                Publication date (Electronic): Oct 18 2021
                Volume: 215
                Issue: 8
                Affiliations
                [1 ] The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
                [2 ] Curtin University, Perth, WA.
                [3 ] BreastScreen WA, Perth, WA.
                [4 ] Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.
                [5 ] Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
                Article
                DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51216
                PubMed ID: 34374095
                SO-VID: 6ae89273-8905-4469-b4ce-30aea06ca4aa
                History

                Keywords: Risk factors,Population health,Mass screening,Mammography,Epidemiology,Breast neoplasms
                Data availability:
                Keywords: Risk factors, Population health, Mass screening, Mammography, Epidemiology, Breast neoplasms

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content49

                See all similar

                Cited by8

                See all cited by