106
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      CD8+ T cells regulate tumour ferroptosis during cancer immunotherapy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cancer immunotherapy restores or enhances the effector function of CD8+ T cells in the tumour microenvironment1,2. CD8+ T cells activated by cancer immunotherapy clear tumours mainly by inducing cell death through perforin-granzyme and Fas-Fas ligand pathways3,4. Ferroptosis is a form of cell death that differs from apoptosis and results from iron-dependent accumulation of lipid peroxide5,6. Although it has been investigated in vitro7,8, there is emerging evidence that ferroptosis might be implicated in a variety of pathological scenarios9,10. It is unclear whether, and how, ferroptosis is involved in T cell immunity and cancer immunotherapy. Here we show that immunotherapy-activated CD8+ T cells enhance ferroptosis-specific lipid peroxidation in tumour cells, and that increased ferroptosis contributes to the anti-tumour efficacy of immunotherapy. Mechanistically, interferon gamma (IFNγ) released from CD8+ T cells downregulates the expression of SLC3A2 and SLC7A11, two subunits of the glutamate-cystine antiporter system xc-, impairs the uptake of cystine by tumour cells, and as a consequence, promotes tumour cell lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. In mouse models, depletion of cystine or cysteine by cyst(e)inase (an engineered enzyme that degrades both cystine and cysteine) in combination with checkpoint blockade synergistically enhanced T cell-mediated anti-tumour immunity and induced ferroptosis in tumour cells. Expression of system xc- was negatively associated, in cancer patients, with CD8+ T cell signature, IFNγ expression, and patient outcome. Analyses of human transcriptomes before and during nivolumab therapy revealed that clinical benefits correlate with reduced expression of SLC3A2 and increased IFNγ and CD8. Thus, T cell-promoted tumour ferroptosis is an anti-tumour mechanism, and targeting this pathway in combination with checkpoint blockade is a potential therapeutic approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition.

            Ferroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death controlled by glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4). At present, mechanisms that could predict sensitivity and/or resistance and that may be exploited to modulate ferroptosis are needed. We applied two independent approaches-a genome-wide CRISPR-based genetic screen and microarray analysis of ferroptosis-resistant cell lines-to uncover acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) as an essential component for ferroptosis execution. Specifically, Gpx4-Acsl4 double-knockout cells showed marked resistance to ferroptosis. Mechanistically, ACSL4 enriched cellular membranes with long polyunsaturated ω6 fatty acids. Moreover, ACSL4 was preferentially expressed in a panel of basal-like breast cancer cell lines and predicted their sensitivity to ferroptosis. Pharmacological targeting of ACSL4 with thiazolidinediones, a class of antidiabetic compound, ameliorated tissue demise in a mouse model of ferroptosis, suggesting that ACSL4 inhibition is a viable therapeutic approach to preventing ferroptosis-related diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Oxidized arachidonic and adrenic PEs navigate cells to ferroptosis.

              Enigmatic lipid peroxidation products have been claimed as the proximate executioners of ferroptosis-a specialized death program triggered by insufficiency of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4). Using quantitative redox lipidomics, reverse genetics, bioinformatics and systems biology, we discovered that ferroptosis involves a highly organized oxygenation center, wherein oxidation in endoplasmic-reticulum-associated compartments occurs on only one class of phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs)) and is specific toward two fatty acyls-arachidonoyl (AA) and adrenoyl (AdA). Suppression of AA or AdA esterification into PE by genetic or pharmacological inhibition of acyl-CoA synthase 4 (ACSL4) acts as a specific antiferroptotic rescue pathway. Lipoxygenase (LOX) generates doubly and triply-oxygenated (15-hydroperoxy)-diacylated PE species, which act as death signals, and tocopherols and tocotrienols (vitamin E) suppress LOX and protect against ferroptosis, suggesting a homeostatic physiological role for vitamin E. This oxidative PE death pathway may also represent a target for drug discovery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature
                Nature
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1476-4687
                0028-0836
                May 2019
                : 569
                : 7755
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [2 ] Center of Excellence for Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [3 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [4 ] Department of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [5 ] Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [6 ] Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [7 ] Institute for Cancer Genetics, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
                [8 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [9 ] Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
                [10 ] Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
                [11 ] Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [12 ] Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
                [13 ] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
                [14 ] Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. wzou@med.umich.edu.
                [15 ] Center of Excellence for Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. wzou@med.umich.edu.
                [16 ] Department of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. wzou@med.umich.edu.
                [17 ] Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. wzou@med.umich.edu.
                [18 ] Graduate Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. wzou@med.umich.edu.
                Article
                NIHMS1525540 10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y
                10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y
                6533917
                31043744
                2e5dbafa-26af-4d75-8c64-930b42e61dee
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article