0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences Between the 2016 and 2022 Food and Drug Administration Guidance—Implications for Design and Interpretation of Clinical Trials in Ulcerative Colitis

      brief-report
      , MD, PhD, , MD, MPH, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , , MBChB, DPhil
      Crohn's & Colitis 360
      Oxford University Press
      clinical trials, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated its draft guidance for drug development in ulcerative colitis, replacing the version from 2016. Several changes from the 2016 version merit further discussion as they impact clinical trial design and the interpretation of trial results.

          Methods

          We compared both documents and critically appraised the changes and implications for future clinical trials.

          Results

          The 2022 guidance recommends full colonoscopy, rather than flexible sigmoidoscopy, to document disease activity in all involved segments of the colon. The concordance between the findings of the 2 procedures is very high and there is little evidence to support colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy. The use of colonoscopy, rather than sigmoidoscopy, is also associated with a higher burden to trial participants who must undergo full bowel preparation, cost, and a potential for more adverse events. The definition of the Mayo endoscopic score of 0 was changed from the original publication to “normal appearance of mucosa,” which suggests that endoscopic signs of prior disease, such as pseudopolyps and scarring, are incompatible with a score 0, even though they are not associated with active disease. The term “mucosal healing” has been abolished and histologic outcomes defined as exploratory. A welcome change is that shorter washout periods than 5 half-lives will be considered to reduce patient exposure to corticosteroids as bridging therapy.

          Conclusions

          The 2022 FDA draft guidance includes changes which for the most part are not informed by empirical evidence, which may ultimately complicate interpretation of future trials and preclude comparisons with past trials.

          Abstract

          The 2022 draft guidance for drug development in ulcerative colitis by the Food and Drug Administration has several changes compared to the 2016 guidance; notably, it mandates full colonoscopy, rather than sigmoidoscopy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          STRIDE-II: An Update on the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) Initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target strategies in IBD

          The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) has proposed treatment targets in 2015 for adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to update the original STRIDE statements for incorporating treatment targets in both adult and pediatric IBD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study.

            We assessed oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) prepared with a pH-sensitive polymer coating in 87 patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5-ASA at a dosage of either 4.8 or 1.6 g per day or placebo for six weeks. The outcome was monitored by flexible proctosigmoidoscopic examinations and physicians' assessments at three-week intervals and by patients' recordings of daily symptoms. Results showed 24 percent complete and 50 percent partial responses in those receiving 4.8 g of 5-ASA per day as compared with 5 percent complete and 13 percent partial responses in those receiving placebo (P less than 0.0001, rank-sum test). At a dosage of 1.6 g per day, the response was twice as good as with placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.51). Age, sex, duration of disease, duration of active symptoms, or extent of disease did not affect the clinical outcome. We conclude that oral 5-ASA administered in a dosage of 4.8 g per day is effective therapy, at least in the short term, for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes, and endoscopic and histological appearance in UC

              Objective Both endoscopy and histology may be included in the definition of mucosal healing in UC. This study aimed to establish the association between patient-reported outcomes, specifically symptom measures, and the presence of inflammation as measured by endoscopy and histology in UC. Design Using patient data from an observational multicentre study of UC (n=103), rectal bleeding (RB) and stool frequency (SF) symptom subscores of the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) were compared with the endoscopic subscore (MCSe) and histology. Faecal calprotectin and biopsy cytokine expression were also evaluated. Results When identifying UC patients with inactive disease, RB scores were superior to SF scores and the combination (sensitivity/specificity: MCSe=0/1, RB 77%/81%, SF 62%/95%, RB+SF 54%/95%; MCSe=0, RB 87%/66%, SF 76%/83%, RB+SF 68%/86%). Across different definitions of mucosal healing (MCSe≤1; 0; or 0 plus inactive histology), a larger subset of patients reported increased SF (39%, 25% and 27%, respectively) compared with RB (24%, 13% and 10%). Faecal calprotectin and inflammatory cytokine expression were higher in patients with active disease compared with patients with mucosal healing, but there were no differences between patients using increasingly stringent definitions of mucosal healing. Conclusions Endoscopically inactive disease is associated with absence of RB but not with complete normalisation of SF. Achieving histological remission did not improve symptomatic relief. In addition, in these patients, higher inflammatory biomarker levels were not observed. These data suggest that non-inflammatory changes, such as bowel damage, may contribute to SF in UC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Crohns Colitis 360
                Crohns Colitis 360
                crohnscolitis360
                Crohn's & Colitis 360
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2631-827X
                April 2024
                14 June 2024
                14 June 2024
                : 6
                : 2
                : otae038
                Affiliations
                Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana, Slovenia
                Alimentiv Inc. , London, Ontario, Canada
                Alimentiv Inc. , London, Ontario, Canada
                Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, AL, Canada
                Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, AL, Canada
                INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine , Nancy, France
                INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital , Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
                FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital , Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
                GroupeHospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré – Hartmann, Paris IBD Center , Neuilly sur Seine, France
                Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan, Italy
                Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY, USA
                Alimentiv Inc. , London, Ontario, Canada
                Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Western Ontario , London, ON, Canada
                Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario , London, ON, Canada
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Vipul Jairath, MBChB, DPhil, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Suite 200, 100 Dundas Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B6, Canada ( vjairath@ 123456uwo.ca ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-8014
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4698-9948
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-1351
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-0033
                Article
                otae038
                10.1093/crocol/otae038
                11212343
                e1360aca-309d-4ebd-a876-bd6827609284
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 March 2024
                : 05 June 2024
                : 28 June 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Categories
                Communications
                AcademicSubjects/MED00260
                AcademicSubjects/MED00760
                AcademicSubjects/MED00972

                clinical trials,sigmoidoscopy,colonoscopy
                clinical trials, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article