9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Consolidation and Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 13 , 13 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 1 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 7 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 13 , 34
      Journal of Clinical Oncology
      American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          To address the role of consolidation treatment for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma in a controlled clinical trial.

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          The EMN02/HOVON95 trial compared consolidation treatment with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) or no consolidation after induction and intensification therapy, followed by continuous lenalidomide maintenance. Primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

          RESULTS

          Eight hundred seventy-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive VRD consolidation (451 patients) or no consolidation (427 patients). At a median follow-up of 74.8 months, median PFS with adjustment for pretreatment was prolonged in patients randomly assigned to VRD consolidation (59.3 v 42.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96; P = .016). The PFS benefit was observed across most predefined subgroups, including revised International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetics, and prior treatment. Revised ISS3 stage (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.86) and ampl1q (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.04) were significant adverse prognostic factors. The median duration of maintenance was 33 months (interquartile range 13-86 months). Response ≥ complete response (CR) after consolidation versus no consolidation before start of maintenance was 34% versus 18%, respectively ( P < .001). Response ≥ CR on protocol including maintenance was 59% with consolidation and 46% without ( P < .001). Minimal residual disease analysis by flow cytometry in a subgroup of 226 patients with CR or stringent complete response or very good partial response before start of maintenance demonstrated a 74% minimal residual disease–negativity rate in VRD-treated patients. Toxicity from VRD was acceptable and manageable.

          CONCLUSION

          Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by lenalidomide maintenance improves PFS and depth of response in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma as compared to maintenance alone.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

          Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

            Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) plus autologous stem-cell transplantation is standard treatment in Europe for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We evaluated whether the addition of daratumumab to VTd before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation would improve stringent complete response rate in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma

              High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation has been the standard treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in adults up to 65 years of age. However, promising data on the use of combination therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) in this population have raised questions about the role and timing of transplantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                November 10 2021
                November 10 2021
                : 39
                : 32
                : 3613-3622
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
                [3 ]Department of Hematology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
                [4 ]Department of Hematology, HOVON Data Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [5 ]IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, IST Instituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy
                [6 ]Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
                [7 ]Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [8 ]Medical Oncology, Luzerner Kantonshospital, Luzern, Switzerland
                [9 ]IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli” and Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [10 ]University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
                [11 ]IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Bologna, Italy
                [12 ]Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Seràgnoli Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
                [13 ]Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
                [14 ]ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Niguarda, Milan, Italy
                [15 ]Ospedale San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
                [16 ]Department of Hematology, Transfusion Medicine and Biotechnology Santo Spirito, Civic Hospital, Pescara, Italy
                [17 ]Department of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
                [18 ]Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                [19 ]HOVON Data Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [20 ]Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [21 ]Department of Hematology, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
                [22 ]Department of Hematology, Haga Ziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
                [23 ]Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
                [24 ]Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
                [25 ]University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
                [26 ]Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland
                [27 ]Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [28 ]Department of Hematology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [29 ]Department of Hematology, St Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
                [30 ]Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [31 ]Clinica di Ematologia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
                [32 ]Department of Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia,” University of Catania, Catania, Italy
                [33 ]Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
                [34 ]IRCCS S.Orsola-Malpighi, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.21.01045
                753ee345-966e-4834-aa25-3f2651ac47e0
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article