3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Harvester ant seed removal in an invaded sagebrush ecosystem: Implications for restoration

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A better understanding of seed movement in plant community dynamics is needed, especially in light of disturbance‐driven changes and investments into restoring degraded plant communities. A primary agent of change within the sagebrush‐steppe is wildfire and invasion by non‐native forbs and grasses, primarily cheatgrass ( Bromus tectorum). Our objectives were to quantify seed removal and evaluate ecological factors influencing seed removal within degraded sagebrush‐steppe by granivorous Owyhee harvester ants ( Pogonomyrmex salinus Olsen). In 2014, we sampled 76 harvester ant nests across 11 plots spanning a gradient of cheatgrass invasion (40%–91% cover) in southwestern Idaho, United States. We presented seeds from four plant species commonly used in postfire restoration at 1.5 and 3.0 m from each nest to quantify seed removal. We evaluated seed selection for presented species, monthly removal, and whether biotic and abiotic factors (e.g., distance to nearest nest, temperature) influenced seed removal. Our top model indicated seed removal was positively correlated with nest height, an indicator of colony size. Distance to seeds and cheatgrass canopy cover reduced seed removal, likely due to increased search and handling time. Harvester ants were selective, removing Indian ricegrass ( Achnatherum hymenoides) more than any other species presented. We suspect this was due to ease of seed handling and low weight variability. Nest density influenced monthly seed removal, as we estimated monthly removal of 1,890 seeds for 0.25 ha plots with 1 nest and 29,850 seeds for plots with 15 nests. Applying monthly seed removal to historical restoration treatments across the western United States showed harvester ants can greatly reduce seed availability at degraded sagebrush sites; for instance, fourwing saltbush ( Atriplex canescens) seeds could be removed in <2 months. Collectively, these results shed light on seed removal by harvester ants and emphasize their potential influence on postfire restoration within invaded sagebrush communities.

          Abstract

          Plant diversity and abundance is profoundly influenced by granivores and is particularly important for degraded landscapes, such as the sagebrush‐steppe. Here, we examine the factors influencing seed removal by Owyhee harvester ants. We found abiotic and biotic processes driving seed removal, and apply removal rates to historical sagebrush restoration treatments to determine the potential impact in restored landscapes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

            How should ecologists and evolutionary biologists analyze nonnormal data that involve random effects? Nonnormal data such as counts or proportions often defy classical statistical procedures. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) provide a more flexible approach for analyzing nonnormal data when random effects are present. The explosion of research on GLMMs in the last decade has generated considerable uncertainty for practitioners in ecology and evolution. Despite the availability of accurate techniques for estimating GLMM parameters in simple cases, complex GLMMs are challenging to fit and statistical inference such as hypothesis testing remains difficult. We review the use (and misuse) of GLMMs in ecology and evolution, discuss estimation and inference and summarize 'best-practice' data analysis procedures for scientists facing this challenge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kpaolini619@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                29 October 2020
                December 2020
                : 10
                : 24 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v10.24 )
                : 13731-13741
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Wyoming Laramie WY USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho Moscow ID USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences University of Idaho Moscow ID USA
                [ 4 ] U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Boise ID USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kelsey E. Paolini, Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, Ross Hall Room 406, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY 82071, USA.

                Email: kpaolini619@ 123456yahoo.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-2020
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4207-3518
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-7690
                Article
                ECE36963
                10.1002/ece3.6963
                7771150
                bed21333-3c74-42a3-af01-5ff7ad7f250b
                © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 July 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                : 01 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 11, Words: 9255
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Geological Survey, Idaho Cooperative Research Unit
                Funded by: Joint Fire Science Program , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100015231;
                Award ID: 11‐1‐2‐30
                Funded by: U.S. Geological Survey , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000203;
                Award ID: 11‐1‐2‐30
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:29.12.2020

                Evolutionary Biology
                cheatgrass,desert granivore,pogonomyrmex,sagebrush restoration,seed removal
                Evolutionary Biology
                cheatgrass, desert granivore, pogonomyrmex, sagebrush restoration, seed removal

                Comments

                Comment on this article