8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in Self-Reported Adult Health and Household Food Security With the 2021 Expanded Child Tax Credit Monthly Payments

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Were 2021 Expanded Child Tax Credit (ECTC) monthly payments associated with changes in adult overall health or household food security?

          Findings

          In this repeated cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data from 39 479 respondents and a difference-in-differences design, eligibility for ECTC payments was associated with improved overall adult health and household food security.

          Meaning

          The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the COVID 19–era policy of ECTC monthly payments may have been associated with improved health and nutrition in adults in eligible households.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The 2021 Expanded Child Tax Credit (ECTC) provided families with children monthly payments from July 2021 to December 2021. The association of this policy with adult health is understudied.

          Objective

          To examine changes in adult self-reported health and household food security before and during ECTC monthly payments.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This repeated cross-sectional study used multivariable regression with a difference-in-differences estimator to assess adult health and food security for 39 479 respondents to the National Health Interview Survey (January 2019 to December 2021) before vs during monthly payments. Analyses were stratified by income to focus on low-income vs middle-income and upper-income households.

          Exposure

          Eligibility for ECTC monthly payments from July 2021 to December 2021.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Overall self-reported adult health and household food security as binary outcomes (excellent or very good health vs good, fair, or poor health; food secure vs food insecure).

          Results

          In this nationally representative cross-sectional study of 39 479 US adults (mean [SD] age, 41.0 [13.0] years; 7234 [21.7%] Hispanic, 321 [0.9%] non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, 2205 [5.7%] non-Hispanic Asian, 5113 [13.7%] non-Hispanic Black, and 23 704 [55.8%] White individuals), respondents were predominantly female (21 511 [52.4%]), employed (33 035 [86.7%]), and married (19 838 [55.7%]). Before disbursement of ECTC monthly payments, 7633 ECTC-eligible adults (60.1%) reported excellent or very good health, and 10 950 (87.8%) reported having food security. Among ECTC-ineligible adults, 10 778 (54.9%) reported excellent or very good health and 17 839 (89.1%) reported food security. Following disbursement of monthly payments, ECTC-eligible adults experienced a 3.0 percentage point (pp) greater adjusted increase (95% CI, 0.2-5.7) in the probability of reporting excellent or very good health compared with ECTC-ineligible adults. Additionally, ECTC-eligible adults experienced a 1.9 pp greater adjusted increase (95% CI, 0.1-3.7) in the probability of food security than ECTC-ineligible adults. In income-stratified analyses, the association between ECTC eligibility and overall health was concentrated among middle-income and upper-income households (3.7-pp increase in excellent or very good health; 95% CI, 0.5-6.9). Conversely, the association between ECTC eligibility and food security was concentrated among low-income adults (3.9-pp increase in food security; 95% CI, 0-7.9).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that monthly ECTC payments were associated with improved adult overall health and food security. Cash transfer programs may be effective tools in improving adult health and household nutrition.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study examines changes in adult self-reported health and household food insecurity before and during Expanded Child Tax Credit monthly payments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

          Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?

              Multiplicity of data, hypotheses, and analyses is a common problem in biomedical and epidemiological research. Multiple testing theory provides a framework for defining and controlling appropriate error rates in order to protect against wrong conclusions. However, the corresponding multiple test procedures are underutilized in biomedical and epidemiological research. In this article, the existing multiple test procedures are summarized for the most important multiplicity situations. It is emphasized that adjustments for multiple testing are required in confirmatory studies whenever results from multiple tests have to be combined in one final conclusion and decision. In case of multiple significance tests a note on the error rate that will be controlled for is desirable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Health Forum
                JAMA Health Forum
                JAMA Health Forum
                American Medical Association
                2689-0186
                24 June 2023
                June 2023
                24 June 2023
                : 4
                : 6
                : e231672
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
                [2 ]University of California, Los Angeles National Clinician Scholars Program, Los Angeles, California
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
                [5 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Kings County, New York
                [6 ]Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
                [7 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 21, 2023.
                Published: June 24, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1672
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Rook JM et al. JAMA Health Forum.
                Corresponding Author: Jordan M. Rook, MD, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Ste 900, Los Angeles, CA 90024 ( jrook@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Rook and Wisk had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Rook, Yama, Schickedanz, Feuerbach, Wisk.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rook, Feuerbach, Lee, Wisk.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Rook, Feuerbach, Wisk.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rook, Yama, Schickedanz, Lee, Wisk.
                Statistical analysis: Rook, Wisk.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Wisk.
                Supervision: Schickedanz, Lee, Wisk.
                Other - Coordinating the team: Rook.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Wisk reported grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/US Department of Health and Human Services outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Dr Rook was supported by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations through the National Clinician Scholars Program Fellowship. Dr Yama was supported by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services through the National Clinician Scholars Program Fellowship. Dr Wisk was supported by NIDDK grants K01 DK116932 and R03 DK132439. Dr Schickedanz was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant K23HD099308) and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services (UA6MC32492, the Life Course Intervention Research Network).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The content of this article does not represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or US Government.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Joann Elmore, MD, MPH, James Macinko, PhD, and Debra Saliba, MD, MPH (University of California, Los Angeles) for their support and guidance. These individuals were not compensated for their contributions.
                Article
                aoi230036
                10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1672
                10290752
                37354539
                059ff88b-9470-43fa-9f1a-43d91f3ad1ef
                Copyright 2023 Rook JM et al. JAMA Health Forum.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 22 December 2022
                : 21 April 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article