111
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brain size affects female but not male survival under predation threat

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is remarkable diversity in brain size among vertebrates, but surprisingly little is known about how ecological species interactions impact the evolution of brain size. Using guppies, artificially selected for large and small brains, we determined how brain size affects survival under predation threat in a naturalistic environment. We cohoused mixed groups of small- and large-brained individuals in six semi-natural streams with their natural predator, the pike cichlid, and monitored survival in weekly censuses over 5 months. We found that large-brained females had 13.5% higher survival compared to small-brained females, whereas the brain size had no discernible effect on male survival. We suggest that large-brained females have a cognitive advantage that allows them to better evade predation, whereas large-brained males are more colourful, which may counteract any potential benefits of brain size. Our study provides the first experimental evidence that trophic interactions can affect the evolution of brain size.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regression Modeling Strategies

          Springer Series in Statistics
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The evolution of self-control.

            Cognition presents evolutionary research with one of its greatest challenges. Cognitive evolution has been explained at the proximate level by shifts in absolute and relative brain volume and at the ultimate level by differences in social and dietary complexity. However, no study has integrated the experimental and phylogenetic approach at the scale required to rigorously test these explanations. Instead, previous research has largely relied on various measures of brain size as proxies for cognitive abilities. We experimentally evaluated these major evolutionary explanations by quantitatively comparing the cognitive performance of 567 individuals representing 36 species on two problem-solving tasks measuring self-control. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that absolute brain volume best predicted performance across species and accounted for considerably more variance than brain volume controlling for body mass. This result corroborates recent advances in evolutionary neurobiology and illustrates the cognitive consequences of cortical reorganization through increases in brain volume. Within primates, dietary breadth but not social group size was a strong predictor of species differences in self-control. Our results implicate robust evolutionary relationships between dietary breadth, absolute brain volume, and self-control. These findings provide a significant first step toward quantifying the primate cognitive phenome and explaining the process of cognitive evolution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Natural Selection on Color Patterns in Poecilia reticulata

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecol Lett
                Ecol. Lett
                ele
                Ecology Letters
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                1461-023X
                1461-0248
                July 2015
                10 May 2015
                : 18
                : 7
                : 646-652
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University Svante Arrhenius väg 18B. SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Savoyenstraße 1a, 1160-Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                [Correction added on 5 June 2015, after first online publication: the author name should read Alberto Corral-Lopez instead of Alberto Corral]

                Article
                10.1111/ele.12441
                4676298
                25960088
                884fa08f-23c9-4637-9056-8df097cd64a4
                © 2015 The Authors Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 February 2015
                : 18 March 2015
                : 27 March 2015
                Categories
                Letters

                Ecology
                artificial selection,brain size,crenicichla,guppy,pike cichlid,poecilia reticulata,predation,semi natural,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article