5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Graphene and graphene oxide with anticancer applications: Challenges and future perspectives

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Graphene‐based materials have shown immense pertinence for sensing/imaging, gene/drug delivery, cancer therapy/diagnosis, and tissue engineering/regenerative medicine. Indeed, the large surface area, ease of functionalization, high drug loading capacity, and reactive oxygen species induction potentials have rendered graphene‐ (G‐) and graphene oxide (GO)‐based (nano)structures promising candidates for cancer therapy applications. Various techniques namely liquid‐phase exfoliation, Hummer's method, chemical vapor deposition, chemically reduced GO, mechanical cleavage of graphite, arc discharge of graphite, and thermal fusion have been deployed for the production of G‐based materials. Additionally, important criteria such as biocompatibility, bio‐toxicity, dispersibility, immunological compatibility, and inflammatory reactions of G‐based structures need to be systematically assessed for additional clinical and biomedical appliances. Furthermore, surface properties (e.g., lateral dimension, charge, corona influence, surface structure, and oxygen content), concentration, detection strategies, and cell types are vital for anticancer activities of these structures. Notably, the efficient accumulation of anticancer drugs in tumor targets/tissues, controlled cellular uptake properties, tumor‐targeted drug release behavior, and selective toxicity toward the cells are crucial criteria that need to be met for developing future anticancer G‐based nanosystems. Herein, important challenges and future perspectives of cancer therapy using G‐ and GO‐based nanosystems have been highlighted, and the recent advancements are deliberated.

          Abstract

          Important challenges, recent advancements, and future perspectives for deploying graphene‐ and graphene oxide‐based nanosystems in cancer therapy are deliberated. Notably, large surface area, ease of functionalization, high drug loading capacity, and reactive oxygen species induction potentials have rendered these structures promising candidates for cancer therapy applications. The ease of functionalization bodes well for their utility in treating assorted types of cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references154

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films

          We describe monocrystalline graphitic films, which are a few atoms thick but are nonetheless stable under ambient conditions, metallic, and of remarkably high quality. The films are found to be a two-dimensional semimetal with a tiny overlap between valence and conductance bands, and they exhibit a strong ambipolar electric field effect such that electrons and holes in concentrations up to 10 13 per square centimeter and with room-temperature mobilities of ∼10,000 square centimeters per volt-second can be induced by applying gate voltage.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene.

            We measured the elastic properties and intrinsic breaking strength of free-standing monolayer graphene membranes by nanoindentation in an atomic force microscope. The force-displacement behavior is interpreted within a framework of nonlinear elastic stress-strain response, and yields second- and third-order elastic stiffnesses of 340 newtons per meter (N m(-1)) and -690 Nm(-1), respectively. The breaking strength is 42 N m(-1) and represents the intrinsic strength of a defect-free sheet. These quantities correspond to a Young's modulus of E = 1.0 terapascals, third-order elastic stiffness of D = -2.0 terapascals, and intrinsic strength of sigma(int) = 130 gigapascals for bulk graphite. These experiments establish graphene as the strongest material ever measured, and show that atomically perfect nanoscale materials can be mechanically tested to deformations well beyond the linear regime.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities

              The intrinsic limits of conventional cancer therapies prompted the development and application of various nanotechnologies for more effective and safer cancer treatment, herein referred to as cancer nanomedicine. Considerable technological success has been achieved in this field, but the main obstacles to nanomedicine becoming a
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                siavashira@gmail.com
                varma.rajender@epa.gov
                Journal
                MedComm (2020)
                MedComm (2020)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2688-2663
                MCO2
                MedComm
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2688-2663
                09 February 2022
                March 2022
                : 3
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/mco2.v3.1 )
                : e118
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Chemistry Cape Breton University Sydney Canada
                [ 2 ] Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran
                [ 3 ] Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Siavash Iravani, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

                Email: siavashira@ 123456gmail.com

                Rajender S. Varma, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Slechtitelu 27, Olomouc, 783 71, Czech Republic.

                Email: varma.rajender@ 123456epa.gov

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7928
                Article
                MCO2118
                10.1002/mco2.118
                8906468
                0a12fa85-a9d1-4660-bb74-59319e0fab5b
                © 2022 The Authors. MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 January 2022
                : 24 November 2021
                : 18 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Pages: 18, Words: 9336
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.2 mode:remove_FC converted:04.03.2022

                cancer nanotherapy,graphene oxide,graphene‐based nanomaterials,graphene

                Comments

                Comment on this article