5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of Surrogates’ Knowledge of Patients’ Treatment Goals and Confidence in Their Ability to Make Surrogate Treatment Decisions

      research-article
      , MD 1 , 2 , , , MS 1 , , MS 1 , 3 , , MA 1 , 3
      JAMA Internal Medicine
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study uses telephone interviews of patients and their surrogates to evaluate surrogates’ knowledge of patients’ treatment goals and confidence in their ability to make patients’ treatment decisions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.

          Clinicians currently rely on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates to make end-of-life treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. Surrogates are instructed to use the substituted judgment standard, which directs them to make the treatment decision that the patient would have made if he or she were capacitated. However, commentators have questioned the accuracy with which surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and manuscript references, to identify published studies that provide empirical data on how accurately surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences and on the efficacy of commonly proposed methods to improve surrogate accuracy. Two of us (D.I.S. and D.W.) reviewed all articles and extracted data on the hypothetical scenarios used to assess surrogate accuracy and the percentage of agreement between patients and surrogates. The search identified 16 eligible studies, involving 151 hypothetical scenarios and 2595 surrogate-patient pairs, which collectively analyzed 19 526 patient-surrogate paired responses. Overall, surrogates predicted patients' treatment preferences with 68% accuracy. Neither patient designation of surrogates nor prior discussion of patients' treatment preferences improved surrogates' predictive accuracy. Patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates incorrectly predict patients' end-of-life treatment preferences in one third of cases. These data undermine the claim that reliance on surrogates is justified by their ability to predict incapacitated patients' treatment preferences. Future studies should assess whether other mechanisms might predict patients' end-of-life treatment preferences more accurately. Also, they should assess whether reliance on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates offers patients and/or their families benefits that are independent of the accuracy of surrogates' decisions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others.

            Clinical practice relies on surrogates to make or help to make treatment decisions for incapacitated adults; however, the effect of this practice on surrogates has not been evaluated. To assess the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for adults who cannot make their own decisions. Empirical studies published in English and listed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, BIOETHICSLINE, PsycINFO, or Scopus before 1 July 2010. Eligible studies provided quantitative or qualitative empirical data, by evaluating surrogates, regarding the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for an incapacitated adult. Information on study location, number and type of surrogates, timing of data collection, type of decisions, patient setting, methods, main findings, and limitations. 40 studies, 29 using qualitative and 11 using quantitative methods, provided data on 2854 surrogates, more than one half of whom were family members of the patient. Most surrogates were surveyed several months to years after making treatment decisions, the majority of which were end-of-life decisions. The quantitative studies found that at least one third of surrogates experienced a negative emotional burden as the result of making treatment decisions. The qualitative studies reported that many or most surrogates experienced negative emotional burden. The negative effects on surrogates were often substantial and typically lasted months or, in some cases, years. The most common negative effects cited by surrogates were stress, guilt over the decisions they made, and doubt regarding whether they had made the right decisions. Nine of the 40 studies also reported beneficial effects on a few surrogates, the most common of which were supporting the patient and feeling a sense of satisfaction. Knowing which treatment is consistent with the patient's preferences was frequently cited as reducing the negative effect on surrogates. Thirty-two of the 40 articles reported data collected in the United States. Because the study populations were relatively homogenous, it is unclear whether the findings apply to other groups. In some cases, the effect of making treatment decisions could not be isolated from that of other stressors, such as grief or prognostic uncertainty. Nine of the studies had a response rate less than 50%, and 9 did not report a response rate. Many of the studies had a substantial interval between the treatment decisions and data collection. Making treatment decisions has a negative emotional effect on at least one third of surrogates, which is often substantial and typically lasts months (or sometimes years). Future research should evaluate ways to reduce this burden, including methods to identify which treatment options are consistent with the patient's preferences. National Institutes of Health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              End-of-life decision-making confidence in surrogates of African-American dialysis patients is overly optimistic.

              Recent studies suggest that surrogate decision makers may be too optimistic about their end-of-life decision making abilities for loved ones. We examined surrogates' decision making confidence with an emphasis on its linkages to their understandings of patients' values and goals for end-of-life care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                American Medical Association
                2168-6106
                2168-6114
                26 November 2018
                February 2019
                26 November 2019
                : 179
                : 2
                : 267-268
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
                [3 ]Program on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Corresponding Author: Terri R. Fried, MD, CERC 151B, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516 ( terri.fried@ 123456yale.edu ).
                Published Online: November 26, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299
                Author Contributions: Dr Fried had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Fried.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Fried, O’Leary.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Fried, Zenoni, Iannone.
                Statistical analysis: Fried, O’Leary.
                Obtained funding: Fried.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Zenoni, Iannone.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Disclaimer: The authors are solely responsible for the contents of this article, which do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.
                Article
                PMC6440224 PMC6440224 6440224 ild180053
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299
                6440224
                30477019
                e4a184d8-d142-44ae-83c0-d094d7c0b133
                Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
                History
                : 5 July 2018
                : 31 July 2018
                : 9 August 2018
                Categories
                Research
                Letters
                Research Letter
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article