3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Older Patients with Gout Initiating Febuxostat versus Allopurinol: a Population-based Cohort Study

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD, MPH 2 , , PhD 3 , , MD, PhD 4 , , MD, MPH 5 , , MD, PhD, FRCPC 6 , , MD, ScD, MSCE 7
      Circulation
      gout, cardiovascular outcomes, adverse events complication, treatment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Hyperuricemia and gout are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI), allopurinol and febuxostat, are the mainstay of urate lowering treatment for gout and may have different effects on cardiovascular risk in patients with gout.

          Methods

          Using U.S. Medicare claims data (2008-2013), we conducted a cohort study for comparative cardiovascular safety of initiating febuxostat versus allopurinol among gout patients aged ≥65 years. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Secondary outcomes were individual endpoints of hospitalization for MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, new and recurrent heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality. We used propensity score (PS) matching with a ratio of 1:3 to control for confounding. We estimated incidence rates (IR) and hazard ratios (HR) for primary and secondary outcomes in the PS-matched cohorts of febuxostat and allopurinol initiators.

          Results

          We included 24,936 febuxostat initiators PS-matched to 74,808 allopurinol initiators. The median age was 76 years, 52% were male, and 12% had cardiovascular disease at baseline. The incidence rate (IR) per 100 person-years for the primary outcome was 3.43 in febuxostat and 3.36 in allopurinol initiators. HR for the primary outcome was 1.01 (95%CI 0.94-1.08) in the febuxostat compared to allopurinol groups. Risk of secondary outcomes including all-cause mortality was similar in both groups, except for a modestly decreased risk of HF exacerbation (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.91-0.99) in febuxostat initiators. The HR for all-cause mortality associated with long-term use of febuxostat (>3 years) was 1.25 (95%CI 0.56-2.80) versus allopurinol. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses consistently showed similar cardiovascular risk in both groups.

          Conclusion

          Among a cohort of 99,744 older Medicare patients with gout, overall there was no difference in the risk of MI, stroke, new onset HF, coronary revascularization, or all-cause mortality between patients initiating febuxostat compared with allopurinol. However, there seemed to be a trend toward an increased, albeit not statistically significant, risk for all-cause mortality in patients who used febuxostat for over 3 years versus allopurinol for over 3 years. The risk of HF exacerbation was slightly lower in febuxostat initiators.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout.

          Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, is a potential alternative to allopurinol for patients with hyperuricemia and gout. We randomly assigned 762 patients with gout and with serum urate concentrations of at least 8.0 mg per deciliter (480 micromol per liter) to receive either febuxostat (80 mg or 120 mg) or allopurinol (300 mg) once daily for 52 weeks; 760 received the study drug. Prophylaxis against gout flares with naproxen or colchicine was provided during weeks 1 through 8. The primary end point was a serum urate concentration of less than 6.0 mg per deciliter (360 micromol per liter) at the last three monthly measurements. The secondary end points included reduction in the incidence of gout flares and in tophus area. The primary end point was reached in 53 percent of patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat, 62 percent of those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, and 21 percent of those receiving allopurinol (P<0.001 for the comparison of each febuxostat group with the allopurinol group). Although the incidence of gout flares diminished with continued treatment, the overall incidence during weeks 9 through 52 was similar in all groups: 64 percent of patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat, 70 percent of those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, and 64 percent of those receiving allopurinol (P=0.99 for 80 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol; P=0.23 for 120 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol). The median reduction in tophus area was 83 percent in patients receiving 80 mg of febuxostat and 66 percent in those receiving 120 mg of febuxostat, as compared with 50 percent in those receiving allopurinol (P=0.08 for 80 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol; P=0.16 for 120 mg of febuxostat vs. allopurinol). More patients in the high-dose febuxostat group than in the allopurinol group (P=0.003) or the low-dose febuxostat group discontinued the study. Four of the 507 patients in the two febuxostat groups (0.8 percent) and none of the 253 patients in the allopurinol group died; all deaths were from causes that the investigators (while still blinded to treatment) judged to be unrelated to the study drugs (P=0.31 for the comparison between the combined febuxostat groups and the allopurinol group). Febuxostat, at a daily dose of 80 mg or 120 mg, was more effective than allopurinol at the commonly used fixed daily dose of 300 mg in lowering serum urate. Similar reductions in gout flares and tophus area occurred in all treatment groups. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records.

            Many cardiovascular epidemiologic studies rely on diagnosis codes in health care claims databases. Despite important changes in the care and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the validity of hospital discharge diagnosis codes for AMI in the US Medicare system has not been recently examined. Our objective was to examine the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases--ninth revision--Clinical Modifications (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis codes and diagnosis-related groups (DRG) codes for AMI in a Medicare claims database. We sampled hospitalization episodes from Medicare beneficiaries in Pennsylvania during 1999, 2000, or both. We used Medicare data to identify patients with hospitalizations containing indicators of AMI (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 410.X0 and 410.X1 or DRG codes 121, 122, and 123). Hospital records for these episodes were reviewed by trained abstractors using World Health Organization criteria for diagnosing AMI. We then calculated the positive predictive value of Medicare claims-based definitions of AMI. Of 2200 hospitalization episodes with Medicare diagnosis codes suggestive of AMI, 2022 hospital records (91.9%) were obtained. The positive predictive value for a primary Medicare claims-based definition was 94.1% (95% CI, 93.0%-95.2%). Positive predictive values for alternative claims-based definitions ranged slightly, with the definition including DRG codes and length-of-stay restrictions yielding the highest positive predictive value, 95.4% (95% CI, 94.3%-96.4%). Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction had a significantly lower positive predictive value than subjects without a history of myocardial infarction (88.1% vs 94.6%, P <.001). In this study, we observed high positive predictive values for a Medicare claims-based diagnosis of AMI and a diagnosis based on structured hospital record review.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

              To compare the urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat, allopurinol, and placebo in a large group of subjects with hyperuricemia and gout, including persons with impaired renal function. Subjects (n = 1,072) with hyperuricemia (serum urate level > or = 8.0 mg/dl) and gout with normal or impaired (serum creatinine level >1.5 to < or = 2.0 mg/dl) renal function were randomized to receive once-daily febuxostat (80 mg, 120 mg, or 240 mg), allopurinol (300 or 100 mg, based on renal function), or placebo for 28 weeks. Significantly (P < or = 0.05) higher percentages of subjects treated with febuxostat 80 mg (48%), 120 mg (65%), and 240 mg (69%) attained the primary end point of last 3 monthly serum urate levels <6.0 mg/dl compared with allopurinol (22%) and placebo (0%). A significantly (P < 0.05) higher percentage of subjects with impaired renal function treated with febuxostat 80 mg (4 [44%] of 9), 120 mg (5 [45%] of 11), and 240 mg (3 [60%] of 5) achieved the primary end point compared with those treated with 100 mg of allopurinol (0 [0%] of 10). Proportions of subjects experiencing any adverse event or serious adverse event were similar across groups, although diarrhea and dizziness were more frequent in the febuxostat 240 mg group. The primary reasons for withdrawal were similar across groups except for gout flares, which were more frequent with febuxostat than with allopurinol. At all doses studied, febuxostat more effectively lowered and maintained serum urate levels <6.0 mg/dl than did allopurinol (300 or 100 mg) or placebo in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout, including those with mild to moderately impaired renal function.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0147763
                2979
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Circulation
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                17 June 2018
                11 September 2018
                11 September 2019
                : 138
                : 11
                : 1116-1126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical research fellow, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology & Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ]Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology & Allergy and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [3 ]Instructor in Medicine, Associate epidemiologist, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [4 ]Associate Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
                [5 ]Statistical analyst, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [6 ]Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
                [7 ]Associate Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology & Allergy and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                Affiliations: From Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (MZ, DHS, RD, SCK). Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea (EHK). Boston Medical Center/ Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (TN)
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Seoyoung C. Kim, MD, ScD, MSCE, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston MA 02120, USA, Phone: 1-617-278-0930, Fax: 1-617-232-8602, sykim@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu
                Article
                PMC6202230 PMC6202230 6202230 nihpa975837
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033992
                6202230
                29899013
                d4f9804e-c270-4115-b384-ba11cd66876c
                History
                Categories
                Article

                treatment,adverse events complication,cardiovascular outcomes,gout

                Comments

                Comment on this article