6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patterns of chemotherapy use in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in a tertiary centre

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated to have significant benefits to survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the current utilization of NAC in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use in patients undergoing cystectomy for MIBC at a large tertiary institution in Australia.

          Methods

          A retrospective study was conducted using data of patients who underwent a radical cystectomy (RC) at a high-volume centre for MIBC between 2011 and 2021.

          Results

          Of 69 patients who had a cystectomy for ≥ pT2 bladder cancer, 73.9% were eligible for NAC. However, of those eligible, only five patients received NAC (9.8%). Of the total patients who were eligible for AC, only 44.4% received postoperative chemotherapy. Common reasons for the lack of uptake were due to patients being unfit or declining treatment. There was no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival in those who received NAC and AC.

          Conclusions

          The majority of patients undergoing RC for MIBC received AC compared to NAC, reflecting the real-world challenge of NAC uptake. This highlights the need for ongoing improvements in selection and usage of NAC and less reliance of AC utilization post RC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines

            This overview presents the updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Bladder (San Franc)
                Bladder (San Franc)
                Bladder
                Bladder
                2327-2120
                2023
                11 December 2023
                : 10
                : e21200013
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Monash Health , Casey, VIC, Australia
                [2 ]School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University , Clayton, VIC, Australia
                [3 ]Department of Oncology, Monash Health , Clayton, VIC, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University , Clayton, VIC, Australia
                Author notes
                * Corresponding author: Dr Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Department of Urology, Monash Health – Casey Hospital, 62-70 Kangan Dr, Berwick, Victoria 3806; Phone +61 9594 6666; Email: kylielim7@ 123456gmail.com

                Declaration of interests: There is no conflict of interest associated with this publication and no financial support was required at time of submission.

                Abbreviation used: AC, adjuvant chemotherapy; CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events; CTCAP, computerised tomography chest, abdominal and pelvic; ddMVAC, dose dense methotrexate vinblastine doxorubicin cisplatin; IQR, interquartile range; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NCDB, National Cancer Database; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RECIST, response evaluation criteria in solid tumours; RC, radical cystectomy; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumour

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3370-3530
                Article
                10.14440/bladder.2023.872
                10754695
                0d1e4434-6f78-4f0b-a0ea-bdf9bbcebd30
                © 2013-2023 Bladder, All rights reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

                History
                : 13 October 2023
                : 27 November 2023
                : 28 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Article

                adjuvant chemotherapy,chemotherapy,cystectomy,neoadjuvant therapy,muscle-invasive bladder cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article