38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: a multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial

      research-article
      , PhD a , , * , , MD c , d , , , PhD b , , PhD e , , PhD g , , MSc o , , Prof, PhD h , , Prof, FRCP q , r , t , , FRCP s , , MD j , , MD m , , BSc n , , PhD q , , PhD e , , PhD h , , PhD i , , MD j , , MSc j , , MD k , l , , Prof, MD q , , NatDipMicr f , , MD g , , PhD c , , MSc c , , PhD b , , PhD a , , Prof, DSc p , , PhD o , , Prof, FRCP c , d , PanACEA consortium
      The Lancet. Infectious Diseases
      Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Tuberculosis is the world's leading infectious disease killer. We aimed to identify shorter, safer drug regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis.

          Methods

          We did a randomised controlled, open-label trial with a multi-arm, multi-stage design. The trial was done in seven sites in South Africa and Tanzania, including hospitals, health centres, and clinical trial centres. Patients with newly diagnosed, rifampicin-sensitive, previously untreated pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:2 ratio to receive (all orally) either 35 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 15–20 mg/kg ethambutol, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 400 mg moxifloxacin, 20 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day with 300 mg SQ109, or a daily standard control regimen (10 mg/kg rifampicin, 5 mg/kg isoniazid, 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide, and 15–20 mg/kg ethambutol). Experimental treatments were given with oral 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 25 mg/kg pyrazinamide per day for 12 weeks, followed by 14 weeks of 5 mg/kg isoniazid and 10 mg/kg rifampicin per day. Because of the orange discoloration of body fluids with higher doses of rifampicin it was not possible to mask patients and clinicians to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time to culture conversion in liquid media within 12 weeks. Patients without evidence of rifampicin resistance on phenotypic test who took at least one dose of study treatment and had one positive culture on liquid or solid media before or within the first 2 weeks of treatment were included in the primary analysis (modified intention to treat). Time-to-event data were analysed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model and adjusted for minimisation variables. The proportional hazard assumption was tested using Schoelfeld residuals, with threshold p<0·05 for non-proportionality. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01785186).

          Findings

          Between May 7, 2013, and March 25, 2014, we enrolled and randomly assigned 365 patients to different treatment arms (63 to rifampicin 35 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol; 59 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, SQ109; 57 to rifampicin 20 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and SQ109; 63 to rifampicin 10 mg/kg, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin; and 123 to the control arm). Recruitment was stopped early in the arms containing SQ109 since prespecified efficacy thresholds were not met at the planned interim analysis. Time to stable culture conversion in liquid media was faster in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin group than in the control group (median 48 days vs 62 days, adjusted hazard ratio 1·78; 95% CI 1·22–2·58, p=0·003), but not in other experimental arms. There was no difference in any of the groups in time to culture conversion on solid media. 11 patients had treatment failure or recurrent disease during post-treatment follow-up: one in the 35 mg/kg rifampicin arm and none in the moxifloxacin arm. 45 (12%) of 365 patients reported grade 3–5 adverse events, with similar proportions in each arm.

          Interpretation

          A dose of 35 mg/kg rifampicin was safe, reduced the time to culture conversion in liquid media, and could be a promising component of future, shorter regimens. Our adaptive trial design was successfully implemented in a multi-centre, high tuberculosis burden setting, and could speed regimen development at reduced cost.

          Funding

          The study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP), the German Ministry for Education and Research (BmBF), and the Medical Research Council UK (MRC).

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The association between sterilizing activity and drug distribution into tuberculosis lesions

          Finding new treatment-shortening antibiotics to improve cure rates and curb the alarming emergence of drug resistance is the major objective of tuberculosis (TB) drug development. Using a MALDI mass spectrometry imaging suite in a biosafety containment facility, we show that the key sterilizing drugs rifampicin and pyrazinamide efficiently penetrate the sites of TB infection in lung lesions. Rifampicin even accumulates in necrotic caseum, a critical lesion site where persisting tubercle bacilli reside 1 . In contrast, moxifloxacin which is active in vitro against persisters, a sub-population of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that persists in specific niches under drug pressure, and achieved treatment shortening in mice 2 , does not diffuse well in caseum, concordant with its failure to shorten therapy in recent clinical trials. We also suggest that such differential spatial distribution and kinetics of accumulation in lesions may create temporal and spatial windows of monotherapy in specific niches, allowing the gradual development of multidrug resistant TB. We propose an alternative working model to prioritize new antibiotic regimens based on quantitative and spatial distribution of TB drugs in the major lesion types found in human lungs. The finding that lesion penetration contributes to treatment outcome has wide implications for TB.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946-1986, with relevant subsequent publications.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Four-Month Moxifloxacin-Based Regimens for Drug-Sensitive Tuberculosis

              Early-phase and preclinical studies suggest that moxifloxacin-containing regimens could allow for effective 4-month treatment of uncomplicated, smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to test the noninferiority of two moxifloxacin-containing regimens as compared with a control regimen. One group of patients received isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 8 weeks, followed by 18 weeks of isoniazid and rifampin (control group). In the second group, we replaced ethambutol with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (isoniazid group), and in the third group, we replaced isoniazid with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (ethambutol group). The primary end point was treatment failure or relapse within 18 months after randomization. Of the 1931 patients who underwent randomization, in the per-protocol analysis, a favorable outcome was reported in fewer patients in the isoniazid group (85%) and the ethambutol group (80%) than in the control group (92%), for a difference favoring the control group of 6.1 percentage points (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 10.5) versus the isoniazid group and 11.4 percentage points (97.5% CI, 6.7 to 16.1) versus the ethambutol group. Results were consistent in the modified intention-to-treat analysis and all sensitivity analyses. The hazard ratios for the time to culture negativity in both solid and liquid mediums for the isoniazid and ethambutol groups, as compared with the control group, ranged from 1.17 to 1.25, indicating a shorter duration, with the lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals exceeding 1.00 in all cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, with events reported in 127 patients (19%) in the isoniazid group, 111 (17%) in the ethambutol group, and 123 (19%) in the control group. The two moxifloxacin-containing regimens produced a more rapid initial decline in bacterial load, as compared with the control group. However, noninferiority for these regimens was not shown, which indicates that shortening treatment to 4 months was not effective in this setting. (Funded by the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development and others; REMoxTB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00864383.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Infect Dis
                Lancet Infect Dis
                The Lancet. Infectious Diseases
                Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
                1473-3099
                1474-4457
                1 January 2017
                January 2017
                : 17
                : 1
                : 39-49
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Lung Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [c ]Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Centre of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
                [d ]German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Munich, Germany
                [e ]Centre for Clinical Tuberculosis Research, Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa
                [f ]MRC Centre for Tuberculosis Research, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa
                [g ]Centre for Tuberculosis Research Innovation, University of Cape Town, Grote Schuur, South Africa
                [h ]Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tumaini University, Moshi, Tanzania
                [i ]Kibong'oto National Tuberculosis Hospital, Tanzania
                [j ]National Institute for Medical Research, Mbeya Medical Research Centre, Mbeya, Tanzania
                [k ]Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
                [l ]University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [m ]Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
                [n ]Division of Infection and Immunity, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, UK
                [o ]MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
                [p ]Medical School University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
                [q ]Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [r ]School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [s ]Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [t ]Department of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Martin J Boeree, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, NetherlandsCorrespondence to: Martin J BoereeRadboud University Medical CenterPO Box 9101NijmegenHB6500Netherlands martin.boeree@ 123456radboudumc.nl
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally

                [†]

                For a complete list of the investigators in the PanACEA MAMS trial see the appendix.

                Article
                S1473-3099(16)30274-2
                10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30274-2
                5159618
                130eb7ff-52f7-4c8e-ac79-26ca704b2dff
                © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article