24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantifying the Association Between Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The relationships between physical activity ( PA ) and both cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM ) have predominantly been estimated using categorical measures of PA , masking the shape of the dose‐response relationship. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, for the very first time we are able to derive a single continuous PA metric to compare the association between PA and CVD /T2 DM , both before and after adjustment for a measure of body weight.

          Methods and Results

          The search was applied to MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases for all studies published from January 1981 to March 2014. A total of 36 studies (3 439 874 participants and 179 393 events, during an average follow‐up period of 12.3 years) were included in the analysis (33 pertaining to CVD and 3 to T2 DM ). An increase from being inactive to achieving recommended PA levels (150 minutes of moderate‐intensity aerobic activity per week) was associated with lower risk of CVD mortality by 23%, CVD incidence by 17%, and T2 DM incidence by 26% (relative risk [ RR ], 0.77 [0.71–0.84]), ( RR , 0.83 [0.77–0.89]), and ( RR , 0.74 [0.72–0.77]), respectively, after adjustment for body weight.

          Conclusions

          By using a single continuous metric for PA levels, we were able to make a comparison of the effect of PA on CVD incidence and mortality including myocardial infarct ( MI ), stroke, and heart failure, as well as T2DM. Effect sizes were generally similar for CVD and T2DM, and suggested that the greatest gain in health is associated with moving from inactivity to small amounts of PA .

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new look at the statistical model identification

            IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

              Strong evidence shows that physical inactivity increases the risk of many adverse health conditions, including major non-communicable diseases such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers, and shortens life expectancy. Because much of the world's population is inactive, this link presents a major public health issue. We aimed to quantify the eff ect of physical inactivity on these major non-communicable diseases by estimating how much disease could be averted if inactive people were to become active and to estimate gain in life expectancy at the population level. For our analysis of burden of disease, we calculated population attributable fractions (PAFs) associated with physical inactivity using conservative assumptions for each of the major non-communicable diseases, by country, to estimate how much disease could be averted if physical inactivity were eliminated. We used life-table analysis to estimate gains in life expectancy of the population. Worldwide, we estimate that physical inactivity causes 6% (ranging from 3·2% in southeast Asia to 7·8% in the eastern Mediterranean region) of the burden of disease from coronary heart disease, 7% (3·9-9·6) of type 2 diabetes, 10% (5·6-14·1) of breast cancer, and 10% (5·7-13·8) of colon cancer. Inactivity causes 9% (range 5·1-12·5) of premature mortality, or more than 5·3 million of the 57 million deaths that occurred worldwide in 2008. If inactivity were not eliminated, but decreased instead by 10% or 25%, more than 533 000 and more than 1·3 million deaths, respectively, could be averted every year. We estimated that elimination of physical inactivity would increase the life expectancy of the world's population by 0·68 (range 0·41-0·95) years. Physical inactivity has a major health eff ect worldwide. Decrease in or removal of this unhealthy behaviour could improve health substantially. None.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of the American Heart Association
                JAHA
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                2047-9980
                September 2016
                September 2016
                : 5
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford & University of Oxford Clinical Academic Graduate School (OUCAGS), Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Watford General Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]The British Heart Foundation Center on Population Approaches for Non‐Communicable Disease Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [4 ]WHO Collaborating Center for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
                [5 ]Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences Department (SPEHS), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [8 ]Bodleian Health Care Libraries, Knowledge Center, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
                Article
                10.1161/JAHA.115.002495
                88696880-75b1-4821-b33b-89ba253dd19c
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article