36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to the journal, click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EXPLORING CONFIDENCE ACCURACY AND ITEM DIFFICULTY IN CHANGING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWERS OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING TEST

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose – Researchers discovered that when students were given the opportunity to change their answers, a majority changed their responses from incorrect to correct, and this change often increased the overall test results. What prompts students to modify their answers? This study aims to examine the modification of scientific reasoning test, with additional exploration on confidence accuracy and its relation to item difficulty. Methodology –A set of pre-test and post-test experiments which included 20 items of scientific reasoning test with confidence judgement on each item were used. The items of the instruments were assessed for their validity by analysing their psychometric properties using the three-parameter (3PL) Item Response Theory, which was carried out in R studio. The set of items were randomly administered to 205 Indonesian undergraduate students with a background in science education related major. The accuracy of confidence was determined by categorising correct or incorrect answers to scientific reasoning questions based on their level of confidence. Findings –The results revealed that responses were modified more frequently from incorrect to correct than from correct to incorrect, resulting in a significant gain in overall scientific reasoning score although these modifications were not shown to be connected to the item’s difficulty level. Even though confidence level also increased significantly, it was observed that Indonesian students repeatedly responded with overconfidence even after sitting for the same test after three weeks, which could indicate a lack of metacognitive ability. The findings of this study serve to spur educators to begin actively engaging in metacognitive training in their teaching and learning activities as a result of overconfidence that frequently occurs among Indonesian students in examinations. Significance –This study provides further substantiation in the field of scientific reasoning and cognitive science; that a trend of confidence accuracy change in scientific reasoning test has been observed. It also contributes to uncovering the true ability of Indonesian students when performing such reasoning tests through their repeated attempts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          South Korea
          South Korea
          Indonesia
          Indonesia
          Journal
          Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction
          UUM Press
          July 31 2023
          : 20
          : 319-341
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea
          [2 ]Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
          [3 ]Department of Biology Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
          [4 ]Department of Science Education, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
          Article
          15749
          10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.5
          3be76267-264b-4e92-8e79-debc50b4749e

          All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

          History

          Education,Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Conflict resolution & Mediation,Education & Public policy,Educational research & Statistics

          Comments

          Comment on this article