2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to Bentham Journals, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of COVID-19 on Psychological Wellbeing of University Employees: The Mediating Role of Coping Mechanism

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The study aims to analyse the employees’ well-being in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario, by studying the mediating impact of coping behaviour in terms of stresses and negative experiences. The study scope is university teaching and staff personnel, constantly using online methods to deliver teaching-learning-evaluation processes.

          Methods:

          Empirical data was collected from 571 university employees through an online survey. The survey instruments were standard scales to assess the impact of events; distress, anxiety & stress, coping strategies, and personal well-being. The data was collected over a week after a month-long lockdown and analysed through CFA and SEM tools.

          Results:

          The role of coping strategies remains central to pandemic or emergency conditions. Statistical analysis shows that distress, anxiety and stress have adversely impacted the coping strategies and well-being of the respondents. The members were identified based on their responses and suitable measures being instituted to strengthen their coping strategies and abilities to deal with adverse situations.

          Conclusion:

          This study contributes to the literature by presenting and validating a theory-driven setting that highlights the degree of negative consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic and lock-down conditions. This research establishes the usefulness of tested personal wellness theories in a non-clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories

              The psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) were evaluated in a normal sample of N = 717 who were also administered the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The DASS was shown to possess satisfactory psychometric properties, and the factor structure was substantiated both by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In comparison to the BDI and BAI, the DASS scales showed greater separation in factor loadings. The DASS Anxiety scale correlated 0.81 with the BAI, and the DASS Depression scale correlated 0.74 with the BDI. Factor analyses suggested that the BDI differs from the DASS Depression scale primarily in that the BDI includes items such as weight loss, insomnia, somatic preoccupation and irritability, which fail to discriminate between depression and other affective states. The factor structure of the combined BDI and BAI items was virtually identical to that reported by Beck for a sample of diagnosed depressed and anxious patients, supporting the view that these clinical states are more severe expressions of the same states that may be discerned in normals. Implications of the results for the conceptualisation of depression, anxiety and tension/stress are considered, and the utility of the DASS scales in discriminating between these constructs is discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                TOPSYJ
                Open Psychol J
                The Open Psychology Journal
                Open Psychol. J.
                Bentham Science Publishers
                1874-3501
                17 November 2023
                2023
                : 16
                : e18743501256495
                Affiliations
                [1 ] deptChitkara Business School , Chitkara University , Punjab 140401, India
                [2 ] deptChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology , Chitkara University , Punjab, , India,
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to this author at the Chitkara Business School, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, India; E-mail: arunaggarwal.mba@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                e18743501256495
                10.2174/0118743501256495231108062146
                47c630cf-fb31-45b1-bdbc-66a9eb3f203c
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 03 July 2023
                : 11 September 2023
                : 13 September 2023
                Categories
                Social Sciences

                Medicine,Chemistry,Life sciences
                Genetics & genomics,Public health,Pandemic,Lock-down,Coronavirus,COVID-19
                Medicine, Chemistry, Life sciences
                Genetics & genomics, Public health, Pandemic, Lock-down, Coronavirus, COVID-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article