11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Plant Defense Responses to Biotic Stress and Its Interplay With Fluctuating Dark/Light Conditions

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plants are subjected to a plethora of environmental cues that cause extreme losses to crop productivity. Due to fluctuating environmental conditions, plants encounter difficulties in attaining full genetic potential for growth and reproduction. One such environmental condition is the recurrent attack on plants by herbivores and microbial pathogens. To surmount such attacks, plants have developed a complex array of defense mechanisms. The defense mechanism can be either preformed, where toxic secondary metabolites are stored; or can be inducible, where defense is activated upon detection of an attack. Plants sense biotic stress conditions, activate the regulatory or transcriptional machinery, and eventually generate an appropriate response. Plant defense against pathogen attack is well understood, but the interplay and impact of different signals to generate defense responses against biotic stress still remain elusive. The impact of light and dark signals on biotic stress response is one such area to comprehend. Light and dark alterations not only regulate defense mechanisms impacting plant development and biochemistry but also bestow resistance against invading pathogens. The interaction between plant defense and dark/light environment activates a signaling cascade. This signaling cascade acts as a connecting link between perception of biotic stress, dark/light environment, and generation of an appropriate physiological or biochemical response. The present review highlights molecular responses arising from dark/light fluctuations vis-à-vis elicitation of defense mechanisms in plants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references354

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The plant immune system.

          Many plant-associated microbes are pathogens that impair plant growth and reproduction. Plants respond to infection using a two-branched innate immune system. The first branch recognizes and responds to molecules common to many classes of microbes, including non-pathogens. The second responds to pathogen virulence factors, either directly or through their effects on host targets. These plant immune systems, and the pathogen molecules to which they respond, provide extraordinary insights into molecular recognition, cell biology and evolution across biological kingdoms. A detailed understanding of plant immune function will underpin crop improvement for food, fibre and biofuels production.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.

            Several reactive oxygen species (ROS) are continuously produced in plants as byproducts of aerobic metabolism. Depending on the nature of the ROS species, some are highly toxic and rapidly detoxified by various cellular enzymatic and nonenzymatic mechanisms. Whereas plants are surfeited with mechanisms to combat increased ROS levels during abiotic stress conditions, in other circumstances plants appear to purposefully generate ROS as signaling molecules to control various processes including pathogen defense, programmed cell death, and stomatal behavior. This review describes the mechanisms of ROS generation and removal in plants during development and under biotic and abiotic stress conditions. New insights into the complexity and roles that ROS play in plants have come from genetic analyses of ROS detoxifying and signaling mutants. Considering recent ROS-induced genome-wide expression analyses, the possible functions and mechanisms for ROS sensing and signaling in plants are compared with those in animals and yeast.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance.

              Traditionally, reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs) were considered to be toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism, which were disposed of using antioxidants. However, in recent years, it has become apparent that plants actively produce ROIs as signaling molecules to control processes such as programmed cell death, abiotic stress responses, pathogen defense and systemic signaling. Recent advances including microarray studies and the development of mutants with altered ROI-scavenging mechanisms provide new insights into how the steady-state level of ROIs are controlled in cells. In addition, key steps of the signal transduction pathway that senses ROIs in plants have been identified. These raise several intriguing questions about the relationships between ROI signaling, ROI stress and the production and scavenging of ROIs in the different cellular compartments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                04 March 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 631810
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Molecular Crop Research Unit, Department of Biochemistry, Chulalongkorn University , Bangkok, Thailand
                [2] 2Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University , Lucknow, India
                [3] 3Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [4] 4Mycology and Plant Disease Survey Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, ARC , Giza, Egypt
                [5] 5Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [6] 6Department of Botany, University of Lucknow , Lucknow, India
                Author notes

                Edited by: Péter Poór, University of Szeged, Hungary

                Reviewed by: Amarjeet Singh, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), India; Jing Yang, Yunnan Agricultural University, China

                *Correspondence: Mohammad Israil Ansari, ansari_mi@ 123456lkouniv.ac.in

                This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2021.631810
                7982811
                33763093
                5bbc2555-4577-4db4-a52f-f476c006ad76
                Copyright © 2021 Iqbal, Iqbal, Hashem, Abd_Allah and Ansari.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 November 2020
                : 08 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 354, Pages: 22, Words: 0
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review

                Plant science & Botany
                biotic stress,dark,defense response,light,plant protection,transcription factor
                Plant science & Botany
                biotic stress, dark, defense response, light, plant protection, transcription factor

                Comments

                Comment on this article