64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Axicabtagene ciloleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. In the previous analysis of the ZUMA-1 registrational study, with a median follow-up of 15·4 months (IQR 13·7–17·3), 89 (82%) of 108 assessable patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel achieved an objective response, and complete responses were noted in 63 (58%) patients. Here we report long-term activity and safety outcomes of the ZUMA-1 study.

          Methods

          ZUMA-1 is a single-arm, multicentre, registrational trial at 22 sites in the USA and Israel. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, and had histologically confirmed large B-cell lymphoma—including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma—according to the 2008 WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue; refractory disease or relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and had previously received an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody containing-regimen and an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Participants received one dose of axicabtagene ciloleucel on day 0 at a target dose of 2 × 10 6 CAR T cells per kg of bodyweight after conditioning chemotherapy with intravenous fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 body-surface area) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m 2 body-surface area) on days −5, −4, and −3. The primary endpoints were safety for phase 1 and the proportion of patients achieving an objective response for phase 2, and key secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Pre-planned activity and safety analyses were done per protocol. ZUMA-1 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number [Related object:]. Although the registrational cohorts are closed, the trial remains open, and recruitment to extension cohorts with alternative endpoints is underway.

          Findings

          Between May 19, 2015, and Sept 15, 2016, 119 patients were enrolled and 108 received axicabtagene ciloleucel across phases 1 and 2. As of the cutoff date of Aug 11, 2018, 101 patients assessable for activity in phase 2 were followed up for a median of 27·1 months (IQR 25·7–28·8), 84 (83%) had an objective response, and 59 (58%) had a complete response. The median duration of response was 11·1 months (4·2–not estimable). The median overall survival was not reached (12·8–not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 3·3–15·0). 52 (48%) of 108 patients assessable for safety in phases 1 and 2 had grade 3 or worse serious adverse events. Grade 3 or worse cytokine release syndrome occurred in 12 (11%) patients, and grade 3 or worse neurological events in 35 (32%). Since the previous analysis at 1 year, additional serious adverse events were reported in four patients (grade 3 mental status changes, grade 4 myelodysplastic syndrome, grade 3 lung infection, and two episodes of grade 3 bacteraemia), none of which were judged to be treatment related. Two treatment-related deaths (due to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and cardiac arrest) were previously reported, but no new treatment-related deaths occurred during the additional follow-up.

          Interpretation

          These 2-year follow-up data from ZUMA-1 suggest that axicabtagene ciloleucel can induce durable responses and a median overall survival of greater than 2 years, and has a manageable long-term safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          100957246
          27004
          Lancet Oncol
          Lancet Oncol.
          The Lancet. Oncology
          1470-2045
          1474-5488
          30 August 2019
          02 December 2018
          January 2019
          09 September 2019
          : 20
          : 1
          : 31-42
          Affiliations
          Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
          Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
          Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
          Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
          University of Miami Health System, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
          Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
          Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
          Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
          Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
          UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
          Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
          University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
          Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
          Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
          University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
          John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
          Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO, USA
          Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA
          City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
          Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
          City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
          Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          Kite, Santa Monica, CA, USA
          University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Frederick L Locke, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA frederick.locke@ 123456moffitt.org

          Contributors

          FLL, JSW, LN, WYG, and SSN designed the study. FLL, AGh, CAJ, DBM, LJL, OOO, YL, IB, BTH, JMT, AD, PMR, PS, IWF, UF, AGo, PAM, JM, TS, JCC, AFH, NLB, WYG, and SSN enrolled and treated patients, and gathered data. FLL, LN, AX, YJ, AB, JMR, JJK, WYG, and SSN analysed and interpreted data. All authors participated in writing the Article, provided feedback throughout the development process, and approved the final submitted version.

          [*]

          These authors contributed equally

          Article
          PMC6733402 PMC6733402 6733402 nihpa1046153
          10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7
          6733402
          30518502
          ba9a6be3-afac-4db3-a1d0-16896dc12514
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article