59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. Besides, we intend to replicate previous studies by investigating test-retest reliability and criterion validity.

          Methods

          In a Dutch community sample 2,238 teachers and 1,513 parents filled out questionnaires regarding problem behaviors and parenting, while 1,831 children reported on sociometric measures at T1. These children were followed-up during three consecutive years. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, construct validity was examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and predictive validity was examined by calculating developmental profiles and linking these to measures of inadequate parenting, parenting stress and social preference. Further, mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to establish norms.

          Results

          Omega was consistently higher than alpha regarding reliability. The original five-factor structure was replicated, and measurement invariance was established on a configural level. Further, higher SDQ scores were associated with future indices of higher inadequate parenting, higher parenting stress and lower social preference. Finally, previous results on test-retest reliability and criterion validity were replicated.

          Conclusions

          This study is the first to show SDQ scores are predictively valid, attesting to the feasibility of the SDQ as a screening instrument. Future research into predictive validity of the SDQ is warranted.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review

              Since its development, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been widely used in both research and practice. The SDQ screens for positive and negative psychological attributes. This review aims to provide an overview of the psychometric properties of the SDQ for 4- to 12-year-olds. Results from 48 studies (N = 131,223) on reliability and validity of the parent and teacher SDQ are summarized quantitatively and descriptively. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter-rater agreement are satisfactory for the parent and teacher versions. At subscale level, the reliability of the teacher version seemed stronger compared to that of the parent version. Concerning validity, 15 out of 18 studies confirmed the five-factor structure. Correlations with other measures of psychopathology as well as the screening ability of the SDQ are sufficient. This review shows that the psychometric properties of the SDQ are strong, particularly for the teacher version. For practice, this implies that the use of the SDQ as a screening instrument should be continued. Longitudinal research studies should investigate predictive validity. For both practice and research, we emphasize the use of a multi-informant approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                L.Stone@pwo.ru.nl
                j.janssens@pwo.ru.nl
                a.vermulst@home.nl
                marloesvandermaten@student.ru.nl
                r.engels@bsi.ru.nl
                r.otten@bsi.ru.nl
                Journal
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychol
                BMC Psychology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-7283
                20 February 2015
                20 February 2015
                2015
                : 3
                : 1
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [ ]Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, Nijmegen, 6500 HE The Netherlands
                [ ]Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Article
                61
                10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8
                4364334
                6fc2ea04-171a-44c8-bbb0-da1f97957823
                © Stone et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 July 2014
                : 3 February 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                sdq,coefficient omega,construct validity,measurement invariance,predictive validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article