7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Data‐driven staging of genetic frontotemporal dementia using multi‐modal MRI

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 37 , 37 , 38 , 1 , 39 , 40 , 1 , 41 , , GENetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI)
      Human Brain Mapping
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
      disease progression, frontotemporal dementia, magnetic resonance imaging, unsupervised machine learning

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Frontotemporal dementia in genetic forms is highly heterogeneous and begins many years to prior symptom onset, complicating disease understanding and treatment development. Unifying methods to stage the disease during both the presymptomatic and symptomatic phases are needed for the development of clinical trials outcomes. Here we used the contrastive trajectory inference (cTI), an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that analyzes temporal patterns in high‐dimensional large‐scale population datasets to obtain individual scores of disease stage. We used cross‐sectional MRI data (gray matter density, T1/T2 ratio as a proxy for myelin content, resting‐state functional amplitude, gray matter fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity) from 383 gene carriers (269 presymptomatic and 115 symptomatic) and a control group of 253 noncarriers in the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative. We compared the cTI‐obtained disease scores to the estimated years to onset (age—mean age of onset in relatives), clinical, and neuropsychological test scores. The cTI based disease scores were correlated with all clinical and neuropsychological tests (measuring behavioral symptoms, attention, memory, language, and executive functions), with the highest contribution coming from mean diffusivity. Mean cTI scores were higher in the presymptomatic carriers than controls, indicating that the method may capture subtle pre‐dementia cerebral changes, although this change was not replicated in a subset of subjects with complete data. This study provides a proof of concept that cTI can identify data‐driven disease stages in a heterogeneous sample combining different mutations and disease stages of genetic FTD using only MRI metrics.

          Abstract

          Unifying methods to stage genetic frontotemporal dementia during both the presymptomatic and symptomatic phases are needed for the development of clinical trials outcomes. We applied an unsupervised machine learning algorithm [the contrastive trajectory inference (cTI)] to multi‐modal MRI from presymptomatic and symptomatic carriers of FTD‐causing mutations to obtain individual scores of disease stage. The cTI based disease scores were correlated with all clinical and neuropsychological tests (measuring behavioral symptoms, attention, memory, language, and executive functions), with the highest contribution coming from mean diffusivity. This study provides a proof of concept that cTI can identify data‐driven disease stages in a heterogeneous sample combining different mutations and disease stages of genetic FTD using only MRI metrics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.

          Non-biological experimental variation or "batch effects" are commonly observed across multiple batches of microarray experiments, often rendering the task of combining data from these batches difficult. The ability to combine microarray data sets is advantageous to researchers to increase statistical power to detect biological phenomena from studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or in studies that require the sequential hybridization of arrays. In general, it is inappropriate to combine data sets without adjusting for batch effects. Methods have been proposed to filter batch effects from data, but these are often complicated and require large batch sizes ( > 25) to implement. Because the majority of microarray studies are conducted using much smaller sample sizes, existing methods are not sufficient. We propose parametric and non-parametric empirical Bayes frameworks for adjusting data for batch effects that is robust to outliers in small sample sizes and performs comparable to existing methods for large samples. We illustrate our methods using two example data sets and show that our methods are justifiable, easy to apply, and useful in practice. Software for our method is freely available at: http://biosun1.harvard.edu/complab/batch/.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm.

            This paper describes DARTEL, which is an algorithm for diffeomorphic image registration. It is implemented for both 2D and 3D image registration and has been formulated to include an option for estimating inverse consistent deformations. Nonlinear registration is considered as a local optimisation problem, which is solved using a Levenberg-Marquardt strategy. The necessary matrix solutions are obtained in reasonable time using a multigrid method. A constant Eulerian velocity framework is used, which allows a rapid scaling and squaring method to be used in the computations. DARTEL has been applied to intersubject registration of 471 whole brain images, and the resulting deformations were evaluated in terms of how well they encode the shape information necessary to separate male and female subjects and to predict the ages of the subjects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

              Based on the recent literature and collective experience, an international consortium developed revised guidelines for the diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. The validation process retrospectively reviewed clinical records and compared the sensitivity of proposed and earlier criteria in a multi-site sample of patients with pathologically verified frontotemporal lobar degeneration. According to the revised criteria, 'possible' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia requires three of six clinically discriminating features (disinhibition, apathy/inertia, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative/compulsive behaviours, hyperorality and dysexecutive neuropsychological profile). 'Probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia adds functional disability and characteristic neuroimaging, while behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia 'with definite frontotemporal lobar degeneration' requires histopathological confirmation or a pathogenic mutation. Sixteen brain banks contributed cases meeting histopathological criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration and a clinical diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies or vascular dementia at presentation. Cases with predominant primary progressive aphasia or extra-pyramidal syndromes were excluded. In these autopsy-confirmed cases, an experienced neurologist or psychiatrist ascertained clinical features necessary for making a diagnosis according to previous and proposed criteria at presentation. Of 137 cases where features were available for both proposed and previously established criteria, 118 (86%) met 'possible' criteria, and 104 (76%) met criteria for 'probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. In contrast, 72 cases (53%) met previously established criteria for the syndrome (P < 0.001 for comparison with 'possible' and 'probable' criteria). Patients who failed to meet revised criteria were significantly older and most had atypical presentations with marked memory impairment. In conclusion, the revised criteria for behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia improve diagnostic accuracy compared with previously established criteria in a sample with known frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Greater sensitivity of the proposed criteria may reflect the optimized diagnostic features, less restrictive exclusion features and a flexible structure that accommodates different initial clinical presentations. Future studies will be needed to establish the reliability and specificity of these revised diagnostic guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                simon.ducharme@mcgill.ca
                Journal
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Hum Brain Mapp
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
                HBM
                Human Brain Mapping
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1065-9471
                1097-0193
                03 February 2022
                15 April 2022
                : 43
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/hbm.v43.6 )
                : 1821-1835
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [ 2 ] Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences University of Brescia Brescia Italy
                [ 3 ] Alzheimer's disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacións Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [ 4 ] Cognitive Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology Donostia University Hospital San Sebastian Gipuzkoa Spain
                [ 5 ] Neuroscience Area Biodonostia Health Research Institute San Sebastian Gipuzkoa Spain
                [ 6 ] Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire, Département des Sciences Neurologiques, CHU de Québec, and Faculté de Médecine Université Laval Quebec Quebec Canada
                [ 7 ] Department of Geriatric Medicine Karolinska University Hospital‐Huddinge Stockholm Sweden
                [ 8 ] Unit for Hereditary Dementias Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital Solna Sweden
                [ 9 ] Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie‐Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
                [ 10 ] Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Tübingen Germany
                [ 11 ] Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit Milan Italy
                [ 12 ] Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences University of Milan, Dino Ferrari Center Milan Italy
                [ 13 ] University of Cambridge Department of Clinical Neurosciences Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, and RC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge UK
                [ 14 ] Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 15 ] Toronto Western Hospital Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Disease Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 16 ] Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences University of Western Ontario London Ontario Canada
                [ 17 ] Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 18 ] Neurology Service University Hospitals Leuven Belgium
                [ 19 ] Leuven Brain Institute KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 20 ] Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal
                [ 21 ] Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
                [ 22 ] Neurology Department Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
                [ 23 ] Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
                [ 24 ] Department of Clinical Neurology University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 25 ] Department of Brain Sciences Imperial College London UK
                [ 26 ] Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Biology, and Health University of Manchester Manchester UK
                [ 27 ] Departments of Geriatric Medicine and Nuclear Medicine Essen University Hospital Essen Germany
                [ 28 ] Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
                [ 29 ] German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
                [ 30 ] Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
                [ 31 ] Department of Neurology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany
                [ 32 ] LANE ‐ Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia Italy
                [ 33 ] Memory Clinic and LANVIE‐Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging University Hospitals and University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
                [ 34 ] Molecular Markers Laboratory IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia Italy
                [ 35 ] Department of Neurofarba University of Florence Italy
                [ 36 ] IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy
                [ 37 ] Department of Neurology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam Netherlands
                [ 38 ] Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre UCL Institute of Neurology London UK
                [ 39 ] Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [ 40 ] Ludmer Centre for Neuroinformatics & Mental Health McGill University Montreal Canada
                [ 41 ] Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry McGill University Montreal Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Simon Ducharme, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.

                Email: simon.ducharme@ 123456mcgill.ca

                [†]

                GENetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI) members are listed in the Appendix.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-0023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-9814
                Article
                HBM25727
                10.1002/hbm.25727
                8933323
                35118777
                a32653b8-d8f6-4f9d-a319-712f62fbf87c
                © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 02 November 2021
                : 07 June 2021
                : 11 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 15, Words: 10495
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondation Brain Canada , doi 10.13039/100009408;
                Funded by: Fonds de Recherche du Québec ‐ Santé , doi 10.13039/501100000156;
                Funded by: Canada Foundation for Innovation , doi 10.13039/501100000196;
                Award ID: CFI Project 34874
                Funded by: Health Canada , doi 10.13039/501100000008;
                Funded by: Brain Canada Foundation , doi 10.13039/100009408;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 15, 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.2 mode:remove_FC converted:18.03.2022

                Neurology
                disease progression,frontotemporal dementia,magnetic resonance imaging,unsupervised machine learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article