75
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between Inherited Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IMPORTANCE

          Individuals genetically predisposed to pancreatic cancer may benefit from early detection. Genes that predispose to pancreatic cancer and the risks of pancreatic cancer associated with mutations in these genes are not well defined.

          OBJECTIVE

          To determine whether inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes are associated with increased risks of pancreatic cancer.

          DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

          Case-control analysis to identify pancreatic cancer predisposition genes; longitudinal analysis of patients with pancreatic cancer for prognosis. The study included 3030 adults diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer and enrolled in a Mayo Clinic registry between October 12, 2000, and March 31, 2016, with last follow-up on June 22, 2017. Reference controls were 123 136 individuals with exome sequence data in the public Genome Aggregation Database and 53 105 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database.

          EXPOSURES

          Individuals were classified based on carrying a deleterious mutation in cancer predisposition genes and having a personal or family history of cancer.

          MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

          Germline mutations in coding regions of 21 cancer predisposition genes were identified by sequencing of products from a custom multiplex polymerase chain reaction–based panel; associations of genes with pancreatic cancer were assessed by comparing frequency of mutations in genes of pancreatic cancer patients with those of reference controls.

          RESULTS

          Comparing 3030 case patients with pancreatic cancer (43.2% female; 95.6% non-Hispanic white; mean age at diagnosis, 65.3 [SD, 10.7] years) with reference controls, significant associations were observed between pancreatic cancer and mutations in CDKN2A (0.3% of cases and 0.02% of controls; odds ratio [OR], 12.33; 95% CI, 5.43–25.61); TP53 (0.2% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.52–14.95); MLH1 (0.13% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.66; 95% CI, 1.94–17.53) ; BRCA2 (1.9% of cases and 0.3% of controls; OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 4.62–8.17); ATM (2.3% of cases and 0.37% of controls; OR, 5.71; 95% CI, 4.38–7.33); and BRCA1 (0.6% of cases and 0.2% of controls; OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.54–4.05).

          CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

          In this case-control study, mutations in 6 genes associated with pancreatic cancer were found in 5.5% of all0 pancreatic cancer patients, including 7.9% of patients with a family history of pancreatic cancer and 5.2% of patients without a family history of pancreatic cancer. Further research is needed for replication in other populations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          7501160
          5346
          JAMA
          JAMA
          JAMA
          0098-7484
          1538-3598
          30 July 2018
          19 June 2018
          14 August 2018
          : 319
          : 23
          : 2401-2409
          Affiliations
          Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Qiagen Sciences Research and Development, Qiagen Inc, Hilden, Germany
          Qiagen Sciences Research and Development, Qiagen Inc, Hilden, Germany
          Qiagen Sciences Research and Development, Qiagen Inc, Hilden, Germany
          Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
          Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
          Author notes

          Author Contributions: Drs Petersen and Couch had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

          Concept and design: Polley, Bamlet, Samara, McWilliams, Petersen, Couch.

          Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hu, Hart, Polley, Gnanaolivu, Shimelis, Lee, Lilyquist, Na, Moore, Antwi, Bamlet, Chaffee, DiCarlo, Wu, Kasi, McWilliams, Petersen, Couch.

          Drafting of the manuscript: Hu, Hart, Shimelis, Na, Moore, Bamlet, Chaffee, Kasi, Petersen, Couch.

          Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hu, Hart, Polley, Gnanaolivu, Shimelis, Lee, Lilyquist, Antwi, Bamlet, DiCarlo, Wu, Samara, Kasi, McWilliams, Petersen.

          Statistical analysis: Hu, Hart, Polley, Gnanaolivu, Shimelis, Na, Moore, Bamlet, Couch.

          Obtained funding: McWilliams, Petersen, Couch.

          Administrative, technical, or material support: Lee, Chaffee, DiCarlo, Wu, Samara, Petersen, Couch.

          Supervision: Petersen, Couch.

          Corresponding Author: Fergus J. Couch, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Stabile 2-42, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 ( couch.fergus@ 123456mayo.edu ).
          Article
          PMC6092184 PMC6092184 6092184 nihpa980905
          10.1001/jama.2018.6228
          6092184
          29922827
          c8b3c6de-a5ed-40ed-a719-ff7b61b88c51
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          492
          27
          432
          7
          Smart Citations
          492
          27
          432
          7
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content268

          Cited by218