Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
91
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has the potential to identify a broad range of pathogens in a single test.

          METHODS

          In a 1-year, multicenter, prospective study, we investigated the usefulness of metagenomic NGS of CSF for the diagnosis of infectious meningitis and encephalitis in hospitalized patients. All positive tests for pathogens on metagenomic NGS were confirmed by orthogonal laboratory testing. Physician feedback was elicited by teleconferences with a clinical microbial sequencing board and by surveys. Clinical effect was evaluated by retrospective chart review.

          RESULTS

          We enrolled 204 pediatric and adult patients at eight hospitals. Patients were severely ill: 48.5% had been admitted to the intensive care unit, and the 30-day mortality among all study patients was 11.3%. A total of 58 infections of the nervous system were diagnosed in 57 patients (27.9%). Among these 58 infections, metagenomic NGS identified 13 (22%) that were not identified by clinical testing at the source hospital. Among the remaining 45 infections (78%), metagenomic NGS made concurrent diagnoses in 19. Of the 26 infections not identified by metagenomic NGS, 11 were diagnosed by serologic testing only, 7 were diagnosed from tissue samples other than CSF, and 8 were negative on metagenomic NGS owing to low titers of pathogens in CSF. A total of 8 of 13 diagnoses made solely by metagenomic NGS had a likely clinical effect, with 7 of 13 guiding treatment.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Routine microbiologic testing is often insufficient to detect all neuroinvasive pathogens. In this study, metagenomic NGS of CSF obtained from patients with meningitis or encephalitis improved diagnosis of neurologic infections and provided actionable information in some cases. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; PDAID ClinicalTrials.gov number, [Related object:].)

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0255562
          5985
          N Engl J Med
          N. Engl. J. Med.
          The New England journal of medicine
          0028-4793
          1533-4406
          29 August 2019
          13 June 2019
          13 December 2019
          : 380
          : 24
          : 2327-2340
          Author notes

          The authors’ full names, academic degrees, and affiliations are listed in the Appendix.

          Dr. Wilson and Ms. Sample contributed equally to this article.

          Address reprint requests to Dr. Chiu at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Box 0134, UCSF China Basin, San Francisco, CA 94107, or at charles.chiu@ 123456ucsf.edu .
          Article
          PMC6764751 PMC6764751 6764751 nihpa1536865
          10.1056/NEJMoa1803396
          6764751
          31189036
          e5caf87e-699e-4f09-a70b-e34cebe21c59
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content507

          Cited by428