2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases?

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/Aims

          Surgeons and endoscopists have started to use endoscopically inserted double pigtail stents (DPTs) in the management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) leaks, including UGI anastomotic leaks. We investigated our own experiences in this patient population.

          Methods

          From March 2017 to June 2020, 12 patients had endoscopic internal drainage of a radiologically proven anastomotic leak after UGI surgery in two tertiary UGI centers. The primary outcome measure was the time to removal of the DPTs after anastomotic healing. The secondary outcome measure was early oral feeding after DPT insertion.

          Results

          Eight of the 12 patients (67%) required only one DPT, whereas four (33%) required two DPTs. The median duration of drainage was 42 days. Two patients required surgery due to inadequate control of sepsis. Of the remaining 10 patients, nine did not require a change in DPT before anastomotic healing. Nine patients were allowed oral fluids within the 1st week and a soft diet in the 2nd week. One patient was allowed clear oral feeds on the 8th day after DPT insertion.

          Conclusions

          Endoscopic internal drainage is becoming an established minimally invasive technique for controlling anastomotic leak after UGI surgery. It allows for early oral nutritional feeding and minimizes discomfort from conventional external drainage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma.

          The management of anastomotic leakage of the oesophago-jejunostomy after total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma was evaluated in a retrospective study. Over a 30-year period, a total of 1114 oesophago-jejunostomies were performed during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In 83 cases (7.5%) a leak of the oesophago-jejunostomy was diagnosed. Frequency of anastomotic leakage was independent of the type of reconstruction and of surgical radicality. Therapeutic management was conservative in 58 cases (69.9%), with placement of a naso-jejunal tube along the anastomoses and with percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscesses. In 25 patients re-operation with resuturing of the anastomoses or surgical drainage of an abscess was performed. Mortality was 11/58 (19%) after conservative treatment of the anastomotic leakage and 16/25 (64%) after re-operation. Conservative management with a naso-intestinal tube and percutaneous drainage of intraabdominal abscesses is realistic for anastomotic leaks. Re-operation results in a high morbidity and should only be considered when conservative management is not successful. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

            Efforts to improve surgical outcomes have traditionally focused on improving preoperative patient selection and reducing the risk of postoperative medical complications. Strategies to optimize surgical technique have been less well studied. We sought to assess the relation between complications related to surgical technique and outcomes after esophagogastrectomy for cancer. Medical records of 510 consecutive patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy for invasive squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed. Data on diagnosis, stage of disease, therapies received, surgical approach, patient comorbidities, technical complications, and postoperative medical complications and outcomes including length of stay and overall survival were determined by one reviewer of the medical records. The primary predictor was surgical complications and the primary outcome was survival. Of the 150 patients studied 138 (27%) had complications directly attributable to surgical technique, such as an anastomotic leak, a paralyzed vocal cord, or chylothorax. At 3 years 43 of 138 patients (31%) with technical complications were alive, whereas 179 of 372 patients (48%) without technical complications were alive. Technical complications were associated with increased length of stay (median 23 days versus 11 days, p < 0.001), increased in-hospital mortality (12.3% versus 3.8%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of medical complications (77.5% versus 47.3%, p < 0.001). After controlling for age, medical comorbidities, use of induction therapy, tumor stage, histology, and location, and completeness of resection the presence of a technical complication was highly predictive of poorer overall survival; the multivariable hazard ratio was 1.41 (1.22 to 1.63, p = 0.008). Technical complications have a large negative impact on survival after esophagogastrectomy for cancer. Strategies to optimize surgical technique and minimize complications should improve outcomes in this cancer operation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial.

              Although surgery is the standard technique for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, use of endoscopic methods is increasing. We performed a single-center, open-label, randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Endosc
                Clin Endosc
                CE
                Clinical Endoscopy
                Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                2234-2400
                2234-2443
                May 2022
                6 January 2022
                : 55
                : 3
                : 401-407
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Service, Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ]Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jeremy TH Tan Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore E-mail: Jeremy.tan.t.h@ 123456singhealth.com.sg
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-5917
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-4571
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0656-2181
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-5482
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6470-3969
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-7525
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7524-4972
                Article
                ce-2021-197
                10.5946/ce.2021.197
                9178146
                34986605
                b92d97c3-1b84-49c0-ba4b-e98ee1bd3bfe
                © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 June 2021
                : 1 September 2021
                : 2 September 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                anastomotic leak,drainage,stents,upper gastrointestinal tract
                Radiology & Imaging
                anastomotic leak, drainage, stents, upper gastrointestinal tract

                Comments

                Comment on this article