65
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-Term Relationships between Synaptic Tenacity, Synaptic Remodeling, and Network Activity

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Long term time-lapse imaging reveals that individual synapses undergo significant structural remodeling not only when driven by activity, but also when network activity is absent, raising questions about how reliably individual synapses maintain connections.

          Abstract

          Synaptic plasticity is widely believed to constitute a key mechanism for modifying functional properties of neuronal networks. This belief implicitly implies, however, that synapses, when not driven to change their characteristics by physiologically relevant stimuli, will maintain these characteristics over time. How tenacious are synapses over behaviorally relevant time scales? To begin to address this question, we developed a system for continuously imaging the structural dynamics of individual synapses over many days, while recording network activity in the same preparations. We found that in spontaneously active networks, distributions of synaptic sizes were generally stable over days. Following individual synapses revealed, however, that the apparently static distributions were actually steady states of synapses exhibiting continual and extensive remodeling. In active networks, large synapses tended to grow smaller, whereas small synapses tended to grow larger, mainly during periods of particularly synchronous activity. Suppression of network activity only mildly affected the magnitude of synaptic remodeling, but dependence on synaptic size was lost, leading to the broadening of synaptic size distributions and increases in mean synaptic size. From the perspective of individual neurons, activity drove changes in the relative sizes of their excitatory inputs, but such changes continued, albeit at lower rates, even when network activity was blocked. Our findings show that activity strongly drives synaptic remodeling, but they also show that significant remodeling occurs spontaneously. Whereas such spontaneous remodeling provides an explanation for “synaptic homeostasis” like processes, it also raises significant questions concerning the reliability of individual synapses as sites for persistently modifying network function.

          Author Summary

          Neurons communicate via synapses, and it is believed that activity-dependent modifications to synaptic connections—synaptic plasticity—is a fundamental mechanism for stably altering the function of neuronal networks. This belief implies that synapses, when not driven to change their properties by physiologically relevant stimuli, should preserve their individual properties over time. Otherwise, physiologically relevant modifications to network function would be gradually lost or become inseparable from stochastically occurring changes in the network. So do synapses actually preserve their properties over behaviorally relevant time scales? To begin to address this question, we examined the structural dynamics of individual postsynaptic densities for several days, while recording and manipulating network activity levels in the same networks. We found that as expected in highly active networks, individual synapses undergo continual and extensive remodeling over time scales of many hours to days. However, we also observed, that synaptic remodeling continues at very significant rates even when network activity is completely blocked. Our findings thus indicate that the capacity of synapses to preserve their specific properties might be more limited than previously thought, raising intriguing questions about the long-term reliability of individual synapses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis.

          Changing the strength of connections between neurons is widely assumed to be the mechanism by which memory traces are encoded and stored in the central nervous system. In its most general form, the synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis states that "activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is induced at appropriate synapses during memory formation and is both necessary and sufficient for the information storage underlying the type of memory mediated by the brain area in which that plasticity is observed." We outline a set of criteria by which this hypothesis can be judged and describe a range of experimental strategies used to investigate it. We review both classical and newly discovered properties of synaptic plasticity and stress the importance of the neural architecture and synaptic learning rules of the network in which it is embedded. The greater part of the article focuses on types of memory mediated by the hippocampus, amygdala, and cortex. We conclude that a wealth of data supports the notion that synaptic plasticity is necessary for learning and memory, but that little data currently supports the notion of sufficiency.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo.

            Dendritic spines were imaged over days to months in the apical tufts of neocortical pyramidal neurons (layers 5 and 2/3) in vivo. A fraction of thin spines appeared and disappeared over a few days, while most thick spines persisted for months. In the somatosensory cortex, from postnatal day (PND) 16 to PND 25 spine retractions exceeded additions, resulting in a net loss of spines. The fraction of persistent spines (lifetime > or = 8 days) grew gradually during development and into adulthood (PND 16-25, 35%; PND 35-80, 54%; PND 80-120, 66%; PND 175-225, 73%), providing evidence that synaptic circuits continue to stabilize even in the adult brain, long after the closure of known critical periods. In 6-month-old mice, spines turn over more slowly in visual compared to somatosensory cortex, possibly reflecting differences in the capacity for experience-dependent plasticity in these brain regions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid and persistent modulation of actin dynamics regulates postsynaptic reorganization underlying bidirectional plasticity.

              The synapse is a highly organized cellular specialization whose structure and composition are reorganized, both positively and negatively, depending on the strength of input signals. The mechanisms orchestrating these changes are not well understood. A plausible locus for the reorganization of synapse components and structure is actin, because it serves as both cytoskeleton and scaffold for synapses and exists in a dynamic equilibrium between F-actin and G-actin that is modulated bidirectionally by cellular signaling. Using a new FRET-based imaging technique to monitor F-actin/G-actin equilibrium, we show here that tetanic stimulation causes a rapid, persistent shift of actin equilibrium toward F-actin in the dendritic spines of rat hippocampal neurons. This enlarges the spines and increases postsynaptic binding capacity. In contrast, prolonged low-frequency stimulation shifts the equilibrium toward G-actin, resulting in a loss of postsynaptic actin and of structure. This bidirectional regulation of actin is actively involved in protein assembly and disassembly and provides a substrate for bidirectional synaptic plasticity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                June 2009
                June 2009
                23 June 2009
                : 7
                : 6
                : e1000136
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel
                [2 ]Network Biology Research Laboratories, Lorry Lokey Interdisciplinary Center for Life Sciences and Engineering, Haifa, Israel
                [3 ]The Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, Haifa, Israel
                Salk Institute for Biological Studies, United States of America
                Author notes

                The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: AM SM NEZ. Performed the experiments: AM RK LG. Analyzed the data: AM RK MK NEZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AM LG NEZ. Wrote the paper: AM NEZ.

                Article
                08-PLBI-RA-5498R3
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1000136
                2693930
                19554080
                a469ccbc-62cf-4907-8630-72b9637eba5b
                Minerbi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 22 December 2008
                : 13 May 2009
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Categories
                Research Article
                Neuroscience
                Neuroscience/Neural Homeostasis
                Neuroscience/Neurodevelopment
                Neuroscience/Neuronal and Glial Cell Biology
                Neuroscience/Neuronal Signaling Mechanisms

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article