15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of CB-618 in Combination with Cefepime, Ceftazidime, Ceftolozane, or Meropenem: the Pharmacological Basis for a Stand-Alone β-Lactamase Inhibitor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          A major challenge in treating patients is the selection of the “right” antibiotic regimen. Given that the optimal β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor pair is dependent upon the spectrum of β-lactamase enzymes produced and the frequency of resistance to the β-lactamase inhibitor, it might be useful if a stand-alone were available for the clinician to pair with the “right” β-lactam rather than only in a fixed combination. We describe herein a one-compartment in vitro infection model studies conducted to identify the magnitudes of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) index for a β-lactamase inhibitor, CB-618, that would restore the activity of four β-lactam partner agents (cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftolozane, and meropenem) with various doses (1 or 2 g) and dosing intervals (8 or 12 h). The challenge panel included Klebsiella pneumoniae ( n = 5), Escherichia coli ( n = 2), and Enterobacter cloacae ( n = 1) strains, which produced a wide variety of β-lactamase enzymes (AmpC, CTXM-15, KPC-2, KPC-3, FOX-5, OXA-1/30, OXA-48, SHV-1, SHV-11, SHV-27, and TEM-1). Free-drug human concentration-time profiles were simulated for each agent, and specimens were collected for drug concentration and bacterial density determinations. CB-618 restored the activity of each β-lactam partner. The magnitudes of the CB-618 ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the MIC (i.e., the AUC/MIC ratio) associated with net bacterial stasis and 1- and 2-log 10 CFU/ml reductions from baseline at 24 h were 11.2, 32.9, and 136.3, respectively. These data may provide a PK-PD basis for the development of a stand-alone β-lactamase inhibitor.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Antimicrob Agents Chemother
          Antimicrob. Agents Chemother
          aac
          aac
          AAC
          Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
          American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
          0066-4804
          1098-6596
          25 September 2017
          22 November 2017
          December 2017
          : 61
          : 12
          : e00630-17
          Affiliations
          [a ]Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA
          [b ]Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to Paul G. Ambrose, PAmbrose@ 123456ICPD.com .

          Citation Ambrose PG, VanScoy BD, Trang M, McCauley-Miller J, Conde H, Bhavnani SM, Alexander DC, Friedrich LV. 2017. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of CB-618 in combination with cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftolozane, or meropenem: the pharmacological basis for a stand-alone β-lactamase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00630-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00630-17.

          Article
          PMC5700306 PMC5700306 5700306 00630-17
          10.1128/AAC.00630-17
          5700306
          28947474
          4aacc439-441d-4bc4-a8de-50260f093a13
          Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

          All Rights Reserved.

          History
          : 7 April 2017
          : 13 July 2017
          : 4 September 2017
          Page count
          Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 7, Words: 3925
          Categories
          Experimental Therapeutics
          Custom metadata
          December 2017

          β-lactamase inhibitor,CB-618,pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics

          Comments

          Comment on this article