16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Antibody-mediated delivery of viral epitopes to tumors harnesses CMV-specific T cells for cancer therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several cancer immunotherapy approaches, such as immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive T-cell therapy, boost T-cell activity against the tumor, but these strategies are not effective in the absence of T cells specific for displayed tumor antigens. Here we outline an immunotherapy in which endogenous T cells specific for a noncancer antigen are retargeted to attack tumors. The approach relies on the use of antibody- peptide epitope conjugates (APECs) to deliver suitable antigens to the tumor surface for presention by HLA-I. To retarget cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T cells against tumors, we used APECs containing CMV-derived epitopes conjugated to tumor-targeting antibodies via metalloprotease-sensitive linkers. These APECs redirect pre-existing CMV immunity against tumor cells in vitro and in mouse cancer models. In vitro, APECs activated specifically CMV-reactive effector T cells whereas a bispecific T-cell engager activated both effector and regulatory T cells. Our approach may provide an effective alternative in cancers that are not amenable to checkpoint inhibitors or other immunotherapies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy

          FOXP3-expressing regulatory T (Treg) cells, which suppress aberrant immune response against self-antigens, also suppress anti-tumor immune response. Infiltration of a large number of Treg cells into tumor tissues is often associated with poor prognosis. There is accumulating evidence that the removal of Treg cells is able to evoke and enhance anti-tumor immune response. However, systemic depletion of Treg cells may concurrently elicit deleterious autoimmunity. One strategy for evoking effective tumor immunity without autoimmunity is to specifically target terminally differentiated effector Treg cells rather than all FOXP3+ T cells, because effector Treg cells are the predominant cell type in tumor tissues. Various cell surface molecules, including chemokine receptors such as CCR4, that are specifically expressed by effector Treg cells can be the candidates for depleting effector Treg cells by specific cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies. In addition, other immunological characteristics of effector Treg cells, such as their high expression of CTLA-4, active proliferation, and apoptosis-prone tendency, can be exploited to control specifically their functions. For example, anti-CTLA-4 antibody may kill effector Treg cells or attenuate their suppressive activity. It is hoped that combination of Treg-cell targeting (e.g., by reducing Treg cells or attenuating their suppressive activity in tumor tissues) with the activation of tumor-specific effector T cells (e.g., by cancer vaccine or immune checkpoint blockade) will make the current cancer immunotherapy more effective.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cancer immunotherapy. A dendritic cell vaccine increases the breadth and diversity of melanoma neoantigen-specific T cells.

            T cell immunity directed against tumor-encoded amino acid substitutions occurs in some melanoma patients. This implicates missense mutations as a source of patient-specific neoantigens. However, a systematic evaluation of these putative neoantigens as targets of antitumor immunity is lacking. Moreover, it remains unknown whether vaccination can augment such responses. We found that a dendritic cell vaccine led to an increase in naturally occurring neoantigen-specific immunity and revealed previously undetected human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-restricted neoantigens in patients with advanced melanoma. The presentation of neoantigens by HLA-A*02:01 in human melanoma was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Vaccination promoted a diverse neoantigen-specific T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in terms of both TCR-β usage and clonal composition. Our results demonstrate that vaccination directed at tumor-encoded amino acid substitutions broadens the antigenic breadth and clonal diversity of antitumor immunity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mass Spectrometry Profiling of HLA-Associated Peptidomes in Mono-allelic Cells Enables More Accurate Epitope Prediction.

              Identification of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-bound peptides by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is poised to provide a deep understanding of rules underlying antigen presentation. However, a key obstacle is the ambiguity that arises from the co-expression of multiple HLA alleles. Here, we have implemented a scalable mono-allelic strategy for profiling the HLA peptidome. By using cell lines expressing a single HLA allele, optimizing immunopurifications, and developing an application-specific spectral search algorithm, we identified thousands of peptides bound to 16 different HLA class I alleles. These data enabled the discovery of subdominant binding motifs and an integrative analysis quantifying the contribution of factors critical to epitope presentation, such as protein cleavage and gene expression. We trained neural-network prediction algorithms with our large dataset (>24,000 peptides) and outperformed algorithms trained on datasets of peptides with measured affinities. We thus demonstrate a strategy for systematically learning the rules of endogenous antigen presentation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9604648
                20305
                Nat Biotechnol
                Nat. Biotechnol.
                Nature biotechnology
                1087-0156
                1546-1696
                30 July 2020
                10 February 2020
                April 2020
                30 August 2020
                : 38
                : 4
                : 420-425
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ]Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [3 ]Medical Research Council Centre for Immune Regulation and Clinical Immunology Service, School of Immunity and Infection, College of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
                [4 ]Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [5 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                D.G.M., R.R.R., K.K., N.G., J.C., S.Z., T.N., W.W.H., S.A., K.J., I.C., F.S., J.M.H., K.S., L.T.M., S.S., L.W., R.J. and E.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. A.K. synthesized peptides and provided intellectual input regarding peptide chemistry. A.B., L. W.E., R.B.C., A.N.H. and S.I.P. provided human samples and intellectual input. R.K.J., D.F. and D.G.D. provided support and assisted in the design of in vivo experiments and intellectual input. D.G.M. and M.C. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

                [* ] Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.C. mcobbold@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-833X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-5181
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-4200
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8173-5778
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-3548
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9505-4444
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-4142
                Article
                PMC7456461 PMC7456461 7456461 nihpa1612332
                10.1038/s41587-019-0404-8
                7456461
                32042168
                8609f82b-91bc-4ed5-bc72-48966306ee81

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article