2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Traditional and Nontraditional Risk Factors in the Development of Strokes Among Young Adults by Sex and Age Group: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          Despite women having fewer traditional risk factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes), strokes are more common in women than men aged ≤45 years. This study examined the contributions of traditional and nontraditional risk factors (eg, migraine, thrombophilia) in the development of strokes among young adults.

          METHODS:

          This retrospective case-control study used Colorado’s All Payer Claims Database (2012–2019). We identified index stroke events in young adults (aged 18–55 years), matched 1:3 to stroke-free controls, by (1) sex, (2) age±2 years, (3) insurance type, and (4) prestroke period. All traditional and nontraditional risk factors were identified from enrollment until a stroke or proxy-stroke date (defined as the prestroke period). Conditional logistic regression models stratified by sex and age group first assessed the association of stroke with counts of risk factors by type and then computed their individual and aggregated population attributable risks.

          RESULTS:

          We included 2618 cases (52% women; 73.3% ischemic strokes) and 7827 controls. Each additional traditional and nontraditional risk factors were associated with an increased risk of stroke in all sex and age groups. In adults aged 18 to 34 years, more strokes were associated with nontraditional (population attributable risk: 31.4% men and 42.7% women) than traditional risk factors (25.3% men and 33.3% women). The contribution of nontraditional risk factors declined with age (19.4% men and 27.9% women aged 45–55 years). The contribution of traditional risk factors peaked among patients aged 35 to 44 years (32.8% men and 39.7% women). Hypertension was the most important traditional risk factor and increased in contribution with age (population attributable risk: 27.8% men and 26.7% women aged 45 to 55 years). Migraine was the most important nontraditional risk factor and decreased in contribution with age (population attributable risk: 20.1% men and 34.5% women aged 18–35 years).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Nontraditional risk factors were as important as traditional risk factors in the development of strokes for both young men and women and have a stronger association with the development of strokes in adults younger than 35 years of age.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
          Circ: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
          Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
          1941-7713
          1941-7705
          March 26 2024
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. (M.H.L., S.N.P.)
          [2 ]Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. (M.H.L., S.S.)
          [3 ]Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Group, Denver (M.H.L., S.L.D., P.M.H).
          [4 ]Rocky Mountain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (S.S.).
          [5 ]Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. (K.S.)
          [6 ]Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. (L.D.L.)
          [7 ]Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland (J.P.).
          [8 ]Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (L.H.S.).
          [9 ]Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora (S.L.D.).
          [10 ]Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (S.L.D., P.M.H.).
          [11 ]Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora (C.J.B.).
          [12 ]Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus (J.F.B.).
          [13 ]Cardiology Section, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora (P.M.H.).
          Article
          10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010307
          900afcfd-b79e-45c8-9ca5-f449f8407b58
          © 2024
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article