5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hiperinsuflação manual em crianças Translated title: Manual hyperinflation in children

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMO A hiperinsuflação manual é utilizada em unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica para promover um flow bias expiratório, porém não há consenso sobre os benefícios da técnica. Assim faz-se necessária uma revisão que apresente suas evidências. Este estudo objetiva revisar a literatura sobre a manobra de hiperinsuflação manual em unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica, para analisar as evidências dessa técnica em relação às formas de aplicação (associadas ou não a outras técnicas), sua segurança, o desempenho dos ressuscitadores manuais e a influência da experiência do fisioterapeuta, além de avaliar a qualidade metodológica dos artigos encontrados. Realizou-se uma busca nas bases de dados: Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMedⓇ, Scopus, CINAHL e SciELO. Dois pesquisadores selecionaram os artigos de forma independente. Verificaram-se os estudos duplicados, avaliados por títulos, resumos e, então, leitura na íntegra. Analisou-se a qualidade dos artigos pela escala PEDro. Foram incluídos seis artigos, sendo dois com alta qualidade metodológica. Os principais resultados trouxeram informações sobre a contribuição da válvula de pressão positiva expiratória final no aumento dos volumes pulmonares e a utilização das compressões torácicas para otimizar o flow bias expiratório, a influência negativa da experiência do operador no aumento do pico de fluxo inspiratório, o desempenho de diferentes ressuscitadores manuais durante a realização da técnica e a segurança na aplicação, com manutenção da estabilidade hemodinâmica e aumento da saturação periférica de oxigênio. Os estudos disponíveis apontam para um efeito positivo da manobra de hiperinsuflação manual realizada em crianças internadas em unidades de terapia intensiva. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42018108056.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Manual hyperinflation is used in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units to promote expiratory flow bias, but there is no consensus on the benefits of the technique. Thus, a review that presents supporting evidence is necessary. This study aims to review the literature on the manual hyperinflation maneuver in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units to analyze the evidence for this technique in terms of the forms of application (associated with other techniques or not), its safety, the performance of manual resuscitators and the influence of the physical therapist’s experience, in addition to evaluating the methodological quality of the identified articles. A search was performed in the following databases: Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMedⓇ, Scopus, CINAHL and SciELO. Two researchers independently selected the articles. Duplicate studies were assessed, evaluated by title and abstract and then read in full. The quality of the articles was analyzed using the PEDro scale. Six articles were included, two of which had high methodological quality. The main results provided information on the contribution of the positive end-expiratory pressure valve to increasing lung volumes and the use of chest compressions to optimize expiratory flow bias, the negative influence of operator experience on the increase in peak inspiratory flow, the performance of different manual resuscitators when used with the technique and the safety of application in terms of maintaining hemodynamic stability and increasing peripheral oxygen saturation. The available studies point to a positive effect of the manual hyperinflation maneuver in children who are admitted to intensive care units. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42018108056.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

          Assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is common practice in systematic reviews. However, the reliability of data obtained with most quality assessment scales has not been established. This report describes 2 studies designed to investigate the reliability of data obtained with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale developed to rate the quality of RCTs evaluating physical therapist interventions. In the first study, 11 raters independently rated 25 RCTs randomly selected from the PEDro database. In the second study, 2 raters rated 120 RCTs randomly selected from the PEDro database, and disagreements were resolved by a third rater; this generated a set of individual rater and consensus ratings. The process was repeated by independent raters to create a second set of individual and consensus ratings. Reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items was calculated using multirater kappas, and reliability of the total (summed) score was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1,1]). The kappa value for each of the 11 items ranged from.36 to.80 for individual assessors and from.50 to.79 for consensus ratings generated by groups of 2 or 3 raters. The ICC for the total score was.56 (95% confidence interval=.47-.65) for ratings by individuals, and the ICC for consensus ratings was.68 (95% confidence interval=.57-.76). The reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items varied from "fair" to "substantial," and the reliability of the total PEDro score was "fair" to "good."
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).

              Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials, but the extent of this evidence in physiotherapy has not previously been surveyed. The aim of this survey is to describe the quantity and quality of randomised controlled trials and the quantity of systematic reviews relevant to physiotherapy. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) was searched. The quality of trials was assessed with the PEDro scale. The search identified a total of 2,376 randomised controlled trials and 332 systematic reviews. The first trial was published in 1955 and the first review was published in 1982. Since that time, the number of trials and reviews has grown exponentially. The mean PEDro quality score has increased from 2.8 in trials published between 1955 and 1959 to 5.0 for trials published between 1995 and 1999. There is a substantial body of evidence about the effects of physiotherapy. However, there remains scope for improvements in the quality of the conduct and reporting of clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rbti
                Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
                Rev. bras. ter. intensiva
                Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB (São Paulo, SP, Brazil )
                0103-507X
                1982-4335
                October 2021
                : 33
                : 4
                : 616-623
                Affiliations
                [1] Ribeirão Preto orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto orgdiv2Programa de Pós-Graduação Brazil
                [2] São Carlos orgnameUniversidade Federal de São Carlos orgdiv1Programa de Pós-Graduação Brazil
                Article
                S0103-507X2021000400616 S0103-507X(21)03300400616
                10.5935/0103-507x.20210071
                99fcee42-8c23-495b-b02f-c791cb56bd4f

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 10 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 8
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Artigo de Revisão

                Physical therapy modalities,Respiration,artificial,Respiratory therapy,Respiratory mechanics,Ventilators,mechanical,Intensive care units,pediatric,Child,Infant,newborn,Modalidades de fisioterapia,Respiração artificial,Terapia respiratória,Mecânica respiratória,Ventiladores mecânicos,Unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica,Criança,Recém-nascido

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content202

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors380