18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Caregiver burden in patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and non-fluent variant and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies on caregiver burden in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration are rare, differ methodologically and show variable results. Single center longitudinal pilot study on caregiver burden and potential risk factors in patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and semantic (svPPA) and non-fluent variants (nfvPPA) primary progressive aphasia. Forty-six bvFTD, nine svPPA, and six nfvPPA patients and caring relatives were analysed for up to 2 years using the Mini-Mental State Examination as global measure for cognitive performance, Frontal Assessment Battery (frontal lobe functions), Frontal Behavioural Inventory (personality and behaviour), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms), Barthel Index and Lawton IADL Scale (basic and instrumental activities of daily living), the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), and in most participants also the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). CSI baseline sum scores were highest in bvFTD (mean ± SD 5.5 ± 3.4, median 5, IQR 6), intermediate in svPPA (2.9 ± 2.3; 3; 3.5) and low in nfvPPA (1.6 ± 2.1; 1; 2). Similar differences of caregiver burden were found using the ZBI. During follow-up, CSI and ZBI sum scores deteriorated in svPPA, not in bvFTD and nfvPPA, and correlated significantly with personality and behaviour, neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver age, and instrumental, but not basic activities of daily living, Mini-Mental State Examination scores or frontal lobe functions. This study reveals differences in caregiver burden in variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Caregivers should be systematically asked for caregiver burden from the time of the diagnosis to provide comprehensive support in time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

              Based on the recent literature and collective experience, an international consortium developed revised guidelines for the diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. The validation process retrospectively reviewed clinical records and compared the sensitivity of proposed and earlier criteria in a multi-site sample of patients with pathologically verified frontotemporal lobar degeneration. According to the revised criteria, 'possible' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia requires three of six clinically discriminating features (disinhibition, apathy/inertia, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative/compulsive behaviours, hyperorality and dysexecutive neuropsychological profile). 'Probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia adds functional disability and characteristic neuroimaging, while behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia 'with definite frontotemporal lobar degeneration' requires histopathological confirmation or a pathogenic mutation. Sixteen brain banks contributed cases meeting histopathological criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration and a clinical diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies or vascular dementia at presentation. Cases with predominant primary progressive aphasia or extra-pyramidal syndromes were excluded. In these autopsy-confirmed cases, an experienced neurologist or psychiatrist ascertained clinical features necessary for making a diagnosis according to previous and proposed criteria at presentation. Of 137 cases where features were available for both proposed and previously established criteria, 118 (86%) met 'possible' criteria, and 104 (76%) met criteria for 'probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. In contrast, 72 cases (53%) met previously established criteria for the syndrome (P < 0.001 for comparison with 'possible' and 'probable' criteria). Patients who failed to meet revised criteria were significantly older and most had atypical presentations with marked memory impairment. In conclusion, the revised criteria for behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia improve diagnostic accuracy compared with previously established criteria in a sample with known frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Greater sensitivity of the proposed criteria may reflect the optimized diagnostic features, less restrictive exclusion features and a flexible structure that accommodates different initial clinical presentations. Future studies will be needed to establish the reliability and specificity of these revised diagnostic guidelines.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Gerhard.Ransmayr@kepleruniklinikum.at
                Journal
                J Neural Transm (Vienna)
                J Neural Transm (Vienna)
                Journal of Neural Transmission
                Springer Vienna (Vienna )
                0300-9564
                1435-1463
                19 July 2021
                19 July 2021
                2021
                : 128
                : 10
                : 1623-1634
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9970.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 5140, Department of Neurology 2, , Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, ; Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021 Linz, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.9970.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 5140, Medical Faculty, , Johannes Kepler University, ; Linz, Austria
                [3 ]GRID grid.9970.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 5140, Department of Applied Systems Research and Statistics, , Johannes Kepler University, ; Linz, Austria
                [4 ]GRID grid.9970.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 5140, Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, , Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, ; Linz, Austria
                [5 ]GRID grid.9970.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1941 5140, Central Radiology Institute, , Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, ; Linz, Austria
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-1420
                Article
                2378
                10.1007/s00702-021-02378-0
                8528762
                34282470
                fc3504ae-c0d4-481b-8478-706c15d9c90f
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 May 2021
                : 1 July 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004061, Oesterreichische Nationalbank;
                Award ID: 13240
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz
                Categories
                Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2021

                behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia,non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia,semantic variant primary progressive aphasia,caregiver burden,instrumental activities of daily living,neuropsychiatric symptoms

                Comments

                Comment on this article