6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fossil evidence for the ancient link between clonal fragmentation, six-fold symmetry and an epizoic lifestyle in asterozoan echinoderms

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Asexual reproduction by means of splitting, also called fissiparity, is a common feature in some asterozoan groups, especially in ophiactid brittle stars. Most fissiparous brittle stars show six instead of the usual five rays, live as epibionts on host organisms, and use clonal fragmentation to rapidly colonize secluded habitats and effectively expand the margins of their distribution area. While the biology and ecology of clonal fragmentation are comparatively well understood, virtually nothing is known about the evolution and geological history of that phenomenon. Here, we describe an exceptional fossil of an articulated six-armed brittle star from the Late Jurassic of Germany, showing one body half in the process of regeneration, and assign it to the new species Ophiactis hex sp. nov. Phylogenetic inference shows that the fossil represents the oldest member of the extant family Ophiactidae. Because the Ophiactis hex specimen shows an original six-fold symmetry combined with a morphology typically found in epizoic ophiuroids, in line with recent fissiparous ophiactid relatives, we assume that the regenerating body half is an indication for fissiparity. Ophiactis hex thus shows that fissiparity was established as a means of asexual reproduction in asterozoan echinoderms by the Late Jurassic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Likelihood Approach to Estimating Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Character Data

            Paul Lewis (2001)
            Evolutionary biologists have adopted simple likelihood models for purposes of estimating ancestral states and evaluating character independence on specified phylogenies; however, for purposes of estimating phylogenies by using discrete morphological data, maximum parsimony remains the only option. This paper explores the possibility of using standard, well-behaved Markov models for estimating morphological phylogenies (including branch lengths) under the likelihood criterion. An important modification of standard Markov models involves making the likelihood conditional on characters being variable, because constant characters are absent in morphological data sets. Without this modification, branch lengths are often overestimated, resulting in potentially serious biases in tree topology selection. Several new avenues of research are opened by an explicitly model-based approach to phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological data, including combined-data likelihood analyses (morphology + sequence data), likelihood ratio tests, and Bayesian analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reproduction by Fragmentation in Corals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Proc. R. Soc. B.
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                May 2024
                May 15 2024
                May 2024
                : 291
                : 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum Luxembourg, 25 rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg
                [2 ]Dinosaurierpark Teufelsschlucht, Ferschweilerstrasse 50, Ernzen, 54668 Germany
                [3 ]Roennebergstraße 5, Berlin 12161, Germany
                [4 ]Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7 Vienna 1010, Austria
                [5 ]Palaeontology Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1 Stuttgart 70191, Germany
                Article
                10.1098/rspb.2023.2832
                8a377298-2fa9-4a06-87ff-6a8dd23853dc
                © 2024

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content52

                Most referenced authors222