1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic review of machine learning-based radiomics approach for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to systematically summarize the performance of the machine learning-based radiomics models in the prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). It was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA) guideline and was registered at the PROSPERO website with an identifier CRD42022295787. Systematic literature searching was conducted in databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to November 10, 2022. Research which applied radiomics analysis on preoperative CT/MRI/PET-CT images for predicting the MSI status in CRC patients with no history of anti-tumor therapies was eligible. The radiomics quality score (RQS) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) were applied to evaluate the research quality (full score 100%). Twelve studies with 4,320 patients were included. All studies were retrospective, and only four had an external validation cohort. The median incidence of MSI was 19% (range 8–34%). The area under the receiver operator curve of the models ranged from 0.78 to 0.96 (median 0.83) in the external validation cohort. The median sensitivity was 0.76 (range 0.32–1.00), and the median specificity was 0.87 (range 0.69–1.00). The median RQS score was 38% (range 14–50%), and half of the studies showed high risk in patient selection as evaluated by QUADAS-2. In conclusion, while radiomics based on pretreatment imaging modalities had a high performance in the prediction of MSI status in CRC, so far it does not appear to be ready for clinical use due to insufficient methodological quality.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11547-023-01593-x.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer Statistics, 2021

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2017) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2018) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2021, 1,898,160 new cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. After increasing for most of the 20th century, the cancer death rate has fallen continuously from its peak in 1991 through 2018, for a total decline of 31%, because of reductions in smoking and improvements in early detection and treatment. This translates to 3.2 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. Long-term declines in mortality for the 4 leading cancers have halted for prostate cancer and slowed for breast and colorectal cancers, but accelerated for lung cancer, which accounted for almost one-half of the total mortality decline from 2014 to 2018. The pace of the annual decline in lung cancer mortality doubled from 3.1% during 2009 through 2013 to 5.5% during 2014 through 2018 in men, from 1.8% to 4.4% in women, and from 2.4% to 5% overall. This trend coincides with steady declines in incidence (2.2%-2.3%) but rapid gains in survival specifically for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For example, NSCLC 2-year relative survival increased from 34% for persons diagnosed during 2009 through 2010 to 42% during 2015 through 2016, including absolute increases of 5% to 6% for every stage of diagnosis; survival for small cell lung cancer remained at 14% to 15%. Improved treatment accelerated progress against lung cancer and drove a record drop in overall cancer mortality, despite slowing momentum for other common cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

            In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data

              This report describes the process of radiomics, its challenges, and its potential power to facilitate better clinical decision making, particularly in the care of patients with cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                qiang.wang@ki.se
                Journal
                Radiol Med
                Radiol Med
                La Radiologia Medica
                Springer Milan (Milan )
                0033-8362
                1826-6983
                17 January 2023
                17 January 2023
                2023
                : 128
                : 2
                : 136-148
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.24381.3c, ISNI 0000 0000 9241 5705, Department of Radiology, , Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, ; Room 601, Novum PI 6, Hiss F, Hälsovägen 7, 141 86 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Department of General Surgery, Songshan Hospital, Chongqing, China
                [4 ]GRID grid.452206.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1758 417X, Department of Vascular Surgery, , The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, ; Chongqing, China
                [5 ]Department of Interventional Therapy, People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, China
                [6 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Department of Oncology-Pathology, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                [7 ]GRID grid.517910.b, Department of Gastroenterology, , Chongqing General Hospital, ; Chongqing, China
                [8 ]GRID grid.412536.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1791 7851, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, , Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, ; Guangzhou, China
                [9 ]GRID grid.459540.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1791 4503, Department of Pharmacy, , Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, ; Guiyang, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6686-6630
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-0797
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4891-8289
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-2863
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-7007
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-1938
                Article
                1593
                10.1007/s11547-023-01593-x
                9938810
                36648615
                ff257606-f0b3-4bce-a529-e2a040e018df
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 November 2022
                : 4 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004543, China Scholarship Council;
                Award ID: 201907930009
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Karolinska Institute
                Categories
                Abdominal Radiology
                Custom metadata
                © Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2023

                radiomics,microsatellite instability,colorectal neoplasms,machine learning,systematic review as topic

                Comments

                Comment on this article