Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety assessment of the process ‘Krones’ used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials

      research-article
      EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF), , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,   , , ,
      EFSA Journal
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      Krones, food contact materials, plastic, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), recycling process, safety assessment

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids deals with the safety assessment of the recycling process Krones pellet ( EU register number RECYC0149). The input to the process is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) ( PET) flakes originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers and containing no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. In this technology, washed and dried PET flakes are extruded to pellets that are then crystallised and decontaminated in a reactor at high temperature under vacuum. Having examined the results of the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that two steps, the extrusion (step 2) and the decontamination in the vacuum reactor (step 4), are the critical steps that determine the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the performance of these critical steps are temperature, residence time and, for the vacuum reactor, also pressure. Under these conditions, it was demonstrated that the recycling process is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.1 μg/kg food. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process when used up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs for long‐term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill, is not considered of safety concern. Trays made of this recycled PET should not be used in microwave and conventional ovens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles

          (2009)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scientific Opinion on the criteria to be used for safety evaluation of a mechanical recycling process to produce recycled PET intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food

            (2011)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines on submission of a dossier for safety evaluation by the EFSA of a recycling process to produce recycled plastics intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food ‐ Opinion of the Scientific Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC)

              (2008)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFSA J
                EFSA J
                10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732
                EFS2
                EFSA Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1831-4732
                26 October 2017
                October 2017
                : 15
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/efs2.2017.15.issue-10 )
                : e05015
                Author notes
                [*] Correspondence: fip@ 123456efsa.europa.eu
                Article
                EFS25015
                10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5015
                7009870
                f27eb6e6-fed4-4ea2-ac0b-8810adb95692
                © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 4429
                Categories
                Scientific Opinion
                Scientific Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:21.01.2020

                krones,food contact materials,plastic,poly(ethylene terephthalate) (pet),recycling process,safety assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content142