5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Eco‐evolutionary feedbacks—Theoretical models and perspectives

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references156

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gene flow and the limits to natural selection

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence.

            Levels of genetic differentiation between populations can be highly variable across the genome, with divergent selection contributing to such heterogeneous genomic divergence. For example, loci under divergent selection and those tightly physically linked to them may exhibit stronger differentiation than neutral regions with weak or no linkage to such loci. Divergent selection can also increase genome-wide neutral differentiation by reducing gene flow (e.g. by causing ecological speciation), thus promoting divergence via the stochastic effects of genetic drift. These consequences of divergent selection are being reported in recently accumulating studies that identify: (i) 'outlier loci' with higher levels of divergence than expected under neutrality, and (ii) a positive association between the degree of adaptive phenotypic divergence and levels of molecular genetic differentiation across population pairs ['isolation by adaptation' (IBA)]. The latter pattern arises because as adaptive divergence increases, gene flow is reduced (thereby promoting drift) and genetic hitchhiking increased. Here, we review and integrate these previously disconnected concepts and literatures. We find that studies generally report 5-10% of loci to be outliers. These selected regions were often dispersed across the genome, commonly exhibited replicated divergence across different population pairs, and could sometimes be associated with specific ecological variables. IBA was not infrequently observed, even at neutral loci putatively unlinked to those under divergent selection. Overall, we conclude that divergent selection makes diverse contributions to heterogeneous genomic divergence. Nonetheless, the number, size, and distribution of genomic regions affected by selection varied substantially among studies, leading us to discuss the potential role of divergent selection in the growth of regions of differentiation (i.e. genomic islands of divergence), a topic in need of future investigation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              On the origin of species by sympatric speciation.

              Understanding speciation is a fundamental biological problem. It is believed that many species originated through allopatric divergence, where new species arise from geographically isolated populations of the same ancestral species. In contrast, the possibility of sympatric speciation (in which new species arise without geographical isolation) has often been dismissed, partly because of theoretical difficulties. Most previous models analysing sympatric speciation concentrated on particular aspects of the problem while neglecting others. Here we present a model that integrates a novel combination of different features and show that sympatric speciation is a likely outcome of competition for resources. We use multilocus genetics to describe sexual reproduction in an individual-based model, and we consider the evolution of assortative mating (where individuals mate preferentially with like individuals) depending either on an ecological character affecting resource use or on a selectively neutral marker trait. In both cases, evolution of assortative mating often leads to reproductive isolation between ecologically diverging subpopulations. When assortative mating depends on a marker trait, and is therefore not directly linked to resource competition, speciation occurs when genetic drift breaks the linkage equilibrium between the marker and the ecological trait. Our theory conforms well with mounting empirical evidence for the sympatric origin of many species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Functional Ecology
                Funct Ecol
                Wiley
                0269-8463
                1365-2435
                November 09 2018
                January 2019
                December 07 2018
                January 2019
                : 33
                : 1
                : 13-30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [2 ]Department of Aquatic Ecology Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zürich Switzerland
                [4 ]ISEM CNRS, IRD, EPHE Université de Montpellier MontpellierFrance
                [5 ]Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive CNRS, IRD, EPHE Université de Montpellier Montpellier France
                [6 ]Queen Mary University of London London UK
                [7 ]Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
                [8 ]Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [9 ]Redpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
                [10 ]Fish Ecology and Evolution DepartmentCenter for Ecology, Evolution and BiogeochemistryEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf Switzerland
                [11 ]Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture Nord University Bodø Norway
                [12 ]Department of Biology Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
                [13 ]Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
                [14 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
                Article
                10.1111/1365-2435.13241
                e75d992f-6b23-4d7a-a6ce-aee5da8ecd5a
                © 2019

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article