3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Lipids Alter Rhodopsin Function via Ligand-like and Solvent-like Interactions

      , , ,
      Biophysical Journal
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d1746096e151">Rhodopsin, a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, is a membrane protein that can sense dim light. This highly effective photoreceptor is known to be sensitive to the composition of its lipidic environment, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this fine-tuned modulation of the receptor’s function and structural stability are not fully understood. There are two competing hypotheses to explain how this occurs: 1) lipid modulation occurs via solvent-like interactions, where lipid composition controls membrane properties like hydrophobic thickness, which in turn modulate the protein’s conformational equilibrium; or 2) protein-lipid interactions are ligand-like, with specific hot spots and long-lived binding events. By analyzing an ensemble of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of five different states of rhodopsin, we show that a local ordering effect takes place in the membrane upon receptor activation. Likewise, docosahexaenoic acid acyl tails and phosphatidylethanolamine headgroups behave like weak ligands, preferentially binding to the receptor in inactive-like conformations and inducing subtle but significant structural changes. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biophysical Journal
          Biophysical Journal
          Elsevier BV
          00063495
          January 2018
          January 2018
          : 114
          : 2
          : 355-367
          Article
          10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.021
          5984976
          29401433
          e66136f3-df53-4f63-b57e-ec53baa8bc1d
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article