7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      DNA damage signalling barrier, oxidative stress and treatment‐relevant DNA repair factor alterations during progression of human prostate cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The DNA damage checkpoints provide an anti‐cancer barrier in diverse tumour types, however this concept has remained unexplored in prostate cancer (CaP). Furthermore, targeting DNA repair defects by PARP1 inhibitors (PARPi) as a cancer treatment strategy is emerging yet requires suitable predictive biomarkers. To address these issues, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of multiple markers of DNA damage signalling, oxidative stress, DNA repair and cell cycle control pathways during progression of human prostate disease from benign hyperplasia, through intraepithelial neoplasia to CaP, complemented by genetic analyses of TMPRSS2‐ERG rearrangement and NQO1, an anti‐oxidant factor and p53 protector. The DNA damage checkpoint barrier (γH2AX, pATM, p53) mechanism was activated during CaP tumorigenesis, albeit less and with delayed culmination compared to other cancers, possibly reflecting lower replication stress (slow proliferation despite cases of Rb loss and cyclin D1 overexpression) and progressive loss of ATM activator NKX3.1. Oxidative stress (8‐oxoguanine lesions) and NQO1 increased during disease progression. NQO1 genotypes of 390 men did not indicate predisposition to CaP, yet loss of NQO1 in CaP suggested potential progression‐opposing tumour suppressor role. TMPRSS2‐ERG rearrangement and PTEN loss, events sensitizing to PARPi, occurred frequently along with heterogeneous loss of DNA repair factors 53BP1, JMJD1C and Rev7 (all studied here for the first time in CaP) whose defects may cause resistance to PARPi. Overall, our results reveal an unorthodox DNA damage checkpoint barrier scenario in CaP tumorigenesis, and provide novel insights into oxidative stress and DNA repair, with implications for biomarker guidance of future targeted therapy of CaP.

          Highlights

          • Activated ATM, γH2AX and p53 ‘checkpoint’ increases during prostate tumorigenesis.

          • Prostate DNA damage checkpoint barrier is delayed and less pronounced than in other cancers.

          • Oxidative stress and NQO1 levels increase with human prostate lesion progression.

          • NKX3.1 or DNA repair factors 53BP1, JMJD1C, Rev7 show focal loss in prostate cancer.

          • TMPRSS2‐ERG gain, loss of PTEN and DNA repair factors may help to predict response to PARP inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          jib@cancer.dk
          jan.bouchal@upol.cz
          jb@cancer.dk
          Journal
          Mol Oncol
          Mol Oncol
          10.1002/(ISSN)1878-0261
          MOL2
          Molecular Oncology
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1574-7891
          1878-0261
          03 March 2016
          June 2016
          : 10
          : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/mol2.2016.10.issue-6 )
          : 879-894
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ]Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
          [ 2 ]Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
          [ 3 ]Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
          [ 4 ]Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
          [ 5 ]Laboratory of Genome Integrity, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
          [ 6 ]Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
          [ 7 ]Division of Experimental Urology, Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
          Author notes
          [*] [* ] Corresponding author. Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: +46 70 431 60 92.

          Corresponding author. Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Palacky University, Hnevotinska 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. Tel.: +420 585 639 570.

          Corresponding author. Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel.: +45 35 25 73 57.

          Article
          PMC5423169 PMC5423169 5423169 MOL22016106879
          10.1016/j.molonc.2016.02.005
          5423169
          26987799
          e4182e58-ce40-494d-bbde-038a7ff7cd58
          © 2016 Federation of European Biochemical Societies
          History
          : 05 January 2016
          : 23 February 2016
          : 24 February 2016
          Page count
          Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 16, Words: 13260
          Categories
          Article
          Articles
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          mol22016106879
          June 2016
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:26.04.2017

          NQO1 and oxidative stress,Prostate tumorigenesis,DNA damage response barrier,p53 and NKX3.1 tumour suppressors,TMPRSS2‐ERG,PARP inhibitor biomarkers

          Comments

          Comment on this article