Successful pregnancy outcome following laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for second degree uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy remains the accepted surgical treatment for women with uterine prolapse. The Manchester repair is favored in women wishing uterine preservation. Vaginal hysterectomy alone fails to address the pathologic cause of the uterine prolapse. The Manchester repair has a high failure rate and may cause difficulty sampling the cervix and uterus in the future. The laparoscopic suture hysteropexy offers physiologic repair of uterine prolapse. At the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy, the pouch of Douglas is closed and the uterosacral ligaments are plicated and reattached to the cervix. Forty-three women with symptomatic uterine prolapse were prospectively evaluated and underwent laparoscopic suture hysteropexy with a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 7 months (range 6-32). The mean operating time for the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy alone was 42 +/- 15 minutes (range 22-121), and the mean blood loss was less than 50 mL. On review, 35 women (81%) had no symptoms of prolapse and 34 (79%) had no objective evidence of uterine prolapse. Two women subsequently completed term pregnancies and were without prolapse. Both underwent elective cesarean delivery. The laparoscopic suture hysteropexy is effective and safe in the management of symptomatic uterine prolapse. The result is physiologically correct, without disfiguring the cervix. This may be an appropriate procedure for women with uterine prolapse wishing uterine preservation.

This study aims to describe and review a new method of uterine conservation in pelvic reconstruction for women with uterine prolapse. This is a prospective study of women who have undergone laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy. Structured questions, visual analogue patient satisfaction score (VAS), and vaginal examination were undertaken. Follow-up was performed by non-surgical reviewers. From July 2001 until August 2003, a total of 81 women underwent laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse. At a mean of 20.3 months follow-up, 76 women (93.8%) were available for questioning and 57 (70.3%) attended for examination. Sixty-five women (87.8%) had no symptoms of pelvic floor prolapse, 54 women (94.7%) had no objective evidence of uterine prolapse, and 61 women (82.4%) were satisfied with their surgery (VAS > or = 80%). Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy attaches the posterior cervix to the sacral promontory via the right uterosacral ligament. Follow-up data of laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy indicate it to be an effective method in the management of uterine prolapse.

To evaluate the efficacy of conservative laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse in women of reproductive age.