1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers and facilitators associated with the use of mental health services among immigrant students in high-income countries: A systematic scoping review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Immigrant students face various challenges in high-income countries that can contribute to the decline of their mental well-being upon arrival in their host country. Despite the growing population of these students in several high-income countries, there is inadequate attention given to their mental health needs and their access to mental health services. Thus, this systematic scoping review aimed to identify gaps in existing research relating to the barriers and facilitators associated with access to and use of mental health services in high-income countries.

          Methods

          Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist as guidance we systematically searched Ovid Medline, APA PsycInfo, Education Source, CINAHL, Web of Science databases for peer reviewed articles related to barriers and facilitators of mental health service use among immigrant students. We conducted a narrative evidence synthesis to highlight barriers and facilitators to the use of mental health services.

          Results

          Out of the 2407 articles initially found, 47 studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered for this review. The increasing attention towards the mental health concerns of immigrant students and their access to mental health services is evident. However, various barriers like stigma, insufficient knowledge, or adherence to traditional gender roles (such as masculinity) hinder their utilization of these services. On the other hand, factors such as being a woman, having a strong sense of cultural adaptation, or possessing adequate mental health literacy serve as facilitators for accessing mental health services.

          Conclusion

          These students have unique experiences, and their needs are often unmet. To improve their mental health and use of mental health services, it is important to consider the barriers they face and their unique experience in their specific life context and to develop tailored prevention and intervention programs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

              The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 June 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 6
                : e0287162
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ] Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, Burwood, Australia
                [3 ] Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Eastern Health Partnership, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
                [4 ] School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ] Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [6 ] School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [7 ] The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
                Monash University, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-6298
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-2412
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6003-139X
                Article
                PONE-D-23-01013
                10.1371/journal.pone.0287162
                10310021
                37384726
                d817fcc6-de8d-4722-9253-e4a47fd9649a
                © 2023 Dombou et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 January 2023
                : 31 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 24
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Culture
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Database Searching
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Clinical Psychology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Undergraduates
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article