15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patient safety in primary care is an emerging field of research with a growing evidence base in western countries but little has been explored in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (GCC) including the Sultanate of Oman. This study aimed to review the literature on the safety culture and patient safety measures used globally to inform the development of safety culture among health care workers in primary care with a particular focus on the Middle East.

          Methods

          A systematic review of the literature. Searches were undertaken using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2000 to 2014. Terms defining safety culture were combined with terms identifying patient safety and primary care.

          Results

          The database searches identified 3072 papers that were screened for inclusion in the review. After the screening and verification, data were extracted from 28 papers that described safety culture in primary care. The global distribution of the articles is as follows: the Netherlands (7), the United States (5), Germany (4), the United Kingdom (1), Australia, Canada and Brazil (two for each country), and with one each from Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The characteristics of the included studies were grouped under the following themes: safety culture in primary care, incident reporting, safety climate and adverse events. The most common theme from 2011 onwards was the assessment of safety culture in primary care (13 studies, 46%). The most commonly used safety culture assessment tool is the Hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC) which has been used in developing countries in the Middle East.

          Conclusions

          This systematic review reveals that the most important first step is the assessment of safety culture in primary care which will provide a basic understanding to safety-related perceptions of health care providers. The HSOPSC has been commonly used in Kuwait, Turkey, and Iran.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations.

          Increasingly, healthcare organizations are becoming aware of the importance of transforming organizational culture in order to improve patient safety. Growing interest in safety culture has been accompanied by the need for assessment tools focused on the cultural aspects of patient safety improvement efforts. This paper discusses the use of safety culture assessment as a tool for improving patient safety. It describes the characteristics of culture assessment tools presently available and discusses their current and potential uses, including brief examples from healthcare organizations that have undertaken such assessments. The paper also highlights critical processes that healthcare organizations need to consider when deciding to use these tools.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A survey on patient safety culture in primary healthcare services in Turkey.

            To evaluate the patient safety culture in primary healthcare units. A cross-sectional study, utilizing the Turkish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and a demographic questionnaire. Twelve primary healthcare centers in the center of the city of Konya, Turkey. One hundred and eighty healthcare staff, including general practitioners (GPs), nurses, midwives and health officers. None. The patient safety culture score including subscores on 12 dimensions and 42 items; patient safety grade and number of events reported. Fifty-four (30%) of the participants were GPs, 48 (27%) were nurses, 51 (28%) were midwives and 27 (15%) were health officers. The mean overall score for positive perception of patient safety culture in primary healthcare units was 46 +/- 20 (43-49 CI). No differences were found by staff members' profession. Among the dimensions of patient safety, those with the highest percentage of positive ratings were teamwork within units (76%) and overall perceptions of safety (59%), whereas those with the lowest percentage of positive ratings were the frequency of event reporting (12%) and non-punitive response to error (18%). Reporting of errors was infrequent with 87% of GPs, 92% of nurses and 91% of other health staff indicating that they did not report or provide feedback about errors. Improving patient safety culture should be a priority among health center administrators. Healthcare staff should be encouraged to report errors without fear of punitive action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Assessment of patient safety culture in primary care setting, Al-Mukala, Yemen

              Background Patient safety culture in primary care is the first step to achieve high quality health care. This study aims to provide a baseline assessment of patient safety culture in primary care settings in Al-Mukala, Yemen as a first published study from a least developed country. Methods A survey was conducted in primary healthcare centres and units in Al-Mukala District, Yemen. A comprehensive sample from the available 16 centres was included. An Arabic version of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture was distributed to all health workers (110). Participants were physicians, nurses and administrative staff. Results The response rate from the participating centres was 71 %. (N = 78). The percent positive responses of the items is equal to the percentage of participants who answered positively. Composite scores were calculated by averaging the percent positive response on the items within a dimension. Positive safety culture was defined as 60 % or more positive responses on items or dimensions. Patient safety culture was perceived to be generally positive with the exception of the dimensions of ‘Communication openness’, ‘Work pressure and pace’ and ‘Patient care tracking/follow-up’, as the percent positive response of these dimensions were 58, 57, and 52 % respectively. Overall, positive rating on quality and patient safety were low (49 and 46 % respectively). Conclusions Although patient safety culture in Al-Mukala primary care setting is generally positive, patient safety and quality rating were fairly low. Implementation of a safety and quality management system in Al-Mukala primary care setting are paramount. Further research is needed to confirm the applicability of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) for Al-Mukala primary care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                drmunali@gmail.com
                sarah.dennis@sydney.edu.au
                stephanie.short@sydney.edu.au
                nadianoorah@yahoo.com
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                30 June 2018
                30 June 2018
                2018
                : 19
                : 104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Health, , The University of Sydney, ; Science Road, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0571 4213, GRID grid.415703.4, Department of Quality Assurance and Patient Safety, Ministry of Health, ; P.O.Box, 626, Wadi Al Kabir, 117 Muscat, PC Oman
                [3 ]GRID grid.429098.e, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, ; Campbell Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170 Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, , The University of Sydney, ; 71 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141 Australia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0571 4213, GRID grid.415703.4, Directorate General of Planning and Study, Ministry of Health, ; Muscat, Oman
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-1929
                Article
                793
                10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7
                6026504
                29960590
                d54dc003-434d-4beb-acdc-e2b5cae854d0
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 February 2018
                : 8 June 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                patent safety,safety culture,primary care,gulf countries,oman
                Medicine
                patent safety, safety culture, primary care, gulf countries, oman

                Comments

                Comment on this article