6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A multicentre, prospective study of plasma circulating tumour DNA test for detecting RAS mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          OncoBEAM TM RAS CRC kit using BEAMing technology is a circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) test for detecting plasma RAS mutational status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a multicentre, prospective study to investigate the concordance of the RAS mutational status between plasma ctDNA and tumour tissue DNA.

          Methods

          mCRC patients without prior anti-EGFR antibodies or regorafenib treatment were enroled. Plasma- and tissue-based RAS mutational status were determined by BEAMing, respectively.

          Results

          A total of 280 patients from eight institutions were eligible. The overall agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 86.4%, with a positive percent agreement of 82.1% and negative percent agreement of 90.4%. From logistic regression analysis, lung metastasis alone indicated the most significant factor associated with discordance. The agreement between plasma- and tissue-based analyses was 64.5% in patients with lung metastasis alone ( n = 31) indicating lower amount of ctDNA. Among the cases with lung metastasis alone, all plasma- and tissue-based analyses were perfectly concordant in cases with ≥20 mm of maximum lesion diameter or ≥10 lesions.

          Conclusion

          The clinical validity of OncoBEAM TM RAS CRC kit was confirmed. Careful attention should be paid for mCRC patients with lung metastases alone having fewer metastases or smaller diameter lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS.

          The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was published in 2016, identifying both a more strategic approach to the administration of the available systemic therapy choices, and a greater emphasis on the use of ablative techniques, including surgery. At the 2016 ESMO Asia Meeting, in December 2016, it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting, endorsed by both ESMO and JSMO, immediately after the JSMO 2017 Annual Meeting. The aim was to adapt the ESMO consensus guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences relating to the toxicity as well as other aspects of certain systemic treatments in patients of Asian ethnicity. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with mCRC identified by the Presidents of the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology), Korea (Korean Association for Clinical Oncology), Malaysia (Malaysian Oncological Society), Singapore (Singapore Society of Oncology) and Taiwan (Taiwan Oncology Society). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients

            Abstract Background RAS assessment is mandatory for therapy decision in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This determination is based on tumor tissue, however, genotyping of circulating tumor (ct)DNA offers clear advantages as a minimally invasive method that represents tumor heterogeneity. Our study aims to evaluate the use of ctDNA as an alternative for determining baseline RAS status and subsequent monitoring of RAS mutations during therapy as a component of routine clinical practice. Patients and methods RAS mutational status in plasma was evaluated in mCRC patients by OncoBEAM™ RAS CRC assay. Concordance of results in plasma and tissue was retrospectively evaluated. RAS mutations were also prospectively monitored in longitudinal plasma samples from selected patients. Results Analysis of RAS in tissue and plasma samples from 115 mCRC patients showed a 93% overall agreement. Plasma/tissue RAS discrepancies were mainly explained by spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity. Analysis of clinico-pathological features showed that the site of metastasis (i.e. peritoneal, lung), the histology of the tumor (i.e. mucinous) and administration of treatment previous to blood collection negatively impacted the detection of RAS in ctDNA. In patients with baseline mutant RAS tumors treated with chemotherapy/antiangiogenic, longitudinal analysis of RAS ctDNA mirrored response to treatment, being an early predictor of response. In patients RAS wt, longitudinal monitoring of RAS ctDNA revealed that OncoBEAM was useful to detect emergence of RAS mutations during anti-EGFR treatment. Conclusion The high overall agreement in RAS mutational assessment between plasma and tissue supports blood-based testing with OncoBEAM™ as a viable alternative for genotyping RAS of mCRC patients in routine clinical practice. Our study describes practical clinico-pathological specifications to optimize RAS ctDNA determination. Moreover, OncoBEAM™ is useful to monitor RAS in patients undergoing systemic therapy to detect resistance and evaluate the efficacy of particular treatments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

              The OPUS study demonstrated that addition of cetuximab to 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) significantly improved objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations, a detrimental effect was seen upon addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX4. The current study reports outcomes in subgroups defined by extended RAS testing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +81 4 7133 1111 , tyoshino@east.ncc.go.jp
                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                24 April 2019
                14 May 2019
                : 120
                : 10
                : 982-986
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.497282.2, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, , National Cancer Center Hospital East, ; Kashiwa, Chiba Japan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0546 3696, GRID grid.414976.9, Department of Surgery, , Kansai Rosai Hospital, ; Amagasaki, Hyogo Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0377 7966, GRID grid.416803.8, Department of Surgery, , National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, ; Osaka, Osaka Japan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8855 274X, GRID grid.416695.9, Division of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, , Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, ; Saitama, Japan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1764 921X, GRID grid.418490.0, Division of Gastroenterology, , Chiba Cancer Center, ; Chiba, Chiba Japan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0618 8403, GRID grid.415740.3, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, , National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, ; Matsuyama, Ehime Japan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0378 6088, GRID grid.412167.7, Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, , Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, ; Sapporo, Hokkaido Japan
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2242 4849, GRID grid.177174.3, Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, , Kyushu University, ; Fukuoka, Fukuoka Japan
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0373 3971, GRID grid.136593.b, Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Graduate School of Medicine, , Osaka University, ; Suita, Osaka Japan
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1777 4627, GRID grid.419812.7, Scientific Affairs Division, Clinical Affairs, , Sysmex Corporation, ; Kobe, Hyogo Japan
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1033 6139, GRID grid.268441.d, Department of Biostatistics, , Yokohama City University School of Medicine, ; Yokohama, Kanagawa Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-9366
                Article
                457
                10.1038/s41416-019-0457-y
                6734650
                31015557
                d53adfc5-5c20-4f25-b288-8c399ff94408
                © Cancer Research UK 2019

                This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

                History
                : 10 December 2018
                : 30 March 2019
                : 4 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Sysmex
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Cancer Research UK 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                colorectal cancer,tumour biomarkers,cancer genomics
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                colorectal cancer, tumour biomarkers, cancer genomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article